Velazquez et al v. Waste Management National Services, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION, CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO SEVER, AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties' stipulation, to extend to June 4, 2013 the deadline to file oppositi ons and to extend to June 11, 2013 the deadline to file replies, is approved. The hearing on both motions is continued from June 21, 2013 to June 28, 2013. The Initial Case Management Conference is continued from June 28, 2013 to August 23, 2013; a Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than August 16, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 23, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

Waukeen Q. McCoy, Esq., (SBN: 168228)
LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY
703 Market Street, Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
WASTE MANAGEMENT NATIONAL )
)
SERVICES,INC.; WASTE
)
MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA,
)
INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF
)
ALAMEDA COUNTY INC;DOES1
)
)
through 50, inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________ )
TEODORA VELAZQUEZ; PHILLIP
PERRY; PAUL BLUM; OSCAR
LARGEASPADA; MARK MARIANI;
KARLTON PRATER; EDDIE
HITCHCOCK; CHARLES MARTIN;
CARL YATES; ANTONIO VICTORIA;
ANTONION INGRAM; ALAN
MANRIQUE;; THOMAS HOOVER, all
individuals

Case No.: CV 13-01404 MMC

STIPULATION TO RESET DEADLINES
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AND MOTION TO SEVER;
PROPOSED ORDER
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION,
CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
AND MOTION TO SEVER, AND
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

24
25
26
27
28

SMRH:408536779.1

-10WBS-175030

1

On May 10, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion to Sever and a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’

2
3
4

First Amended Complaint, with hearing dates on both motions set for June 21, 2013. Plaintiffs’
oppositions to both motions are currently due on May 24, 2013. Defendants’ replies are due on

5
6
7
8
9
10

May 31, 201. The hearing date on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is currently set for June 21,
2013.
Plaintiffs’ counsel has a scheduling conflict that will make it difficult for Plaintiffs to
meaningfully respond to both motions. In light of that, the parties have stipulated to extend the
deadlines for the parties to file oppositions and replies on both motions.

11
12
13

The parties hereby request that the Court extend Plaintiffs’ deadlines to oppose both
motions to June 4, and extend the deadline for Defendants to reply to both motions to June 11.

14
15
16

Dated: May 22, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN MCCOY

17

By:

18
19

__/s/ Matt Springman___________
Matt Springman
Attorney for Plaintiffs

20
21
22

Dated: May 22, 2013

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

23
24

By:

25

__/s/ Morgan Forsey__________
Morgan Forsey
Attorney for Defendants

26
27
28

SMRH:408536779.1

-20WBS-175030

PROPOSED ORDER

1
2

In light of the parties’ stipulation, the deadline for Plaintiffs to oppose Defendants’

3
4

Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Sever is hereby extended to June 4, 2013. The deadlines for

5

Defendants to reply to Plaintiffs’ oppositions is hereby extended to June 11, 2013. The hearing

6

date for both motions is unchanged. hereby continued from June 21, 2013 to June 28, 2013.

7
8
9
10

Further, the Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued from June 28,
2013 to August 23, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no
later than August 16, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED

11
12
13
14

May 23, 2013
DATED: ____________________

_________________________________
HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SMRH:408536779.1

-30WBS-175030