Pacific Dawn LLC et al v. Blank et al

Filing 45

ORDER re: 26 Motion to intervene. Motion hearing set for 7/22/2013 is vacated. Parties and proposed intervenors to file stipulation by 07/19/13 if they agree with the Court's intended ruling. If they do not agree, then the motion hearing will be held on 7/29/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/15/13. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

PACIFIC DAWN LLC, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9

ORDER RE: MOTION TO
INTERVENE

v.
REBECCA BLANK, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

NO. C13-1419 TEH

Defendants.

12
13

This matter is currently before the Court on a motion to intervene brought by

14 Midwater Trawlers Cooperative; Trident Seafoods Corporation; Dulcich, Inc. d/b/a/ Pacific
15 Seafood Group; Arctic Storm Management Group, LLC; and the Environmental Defense
16 Fund (“Proposed Intervenors”). After reviewing the parties’ papers, the Court is inclined to
17 allow intervention with the following modifications to the briefing schedule ordered on
18 June 26, 2013:
19

1. Proposed Intervenors’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment shall

20 be filed on or before September 13, 2013, and shall be limited to no more than 15 pages.
21

2. The page limit on Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply, due on or before September 27,

22 2013, shall be extended to 35 pages.
23

3. Proposed Intervenors’ response to Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed on or before

24 October 11, 2013, and shall be limited to no more than 10 pages.
25

If the parties and Proposed Intervenors agree to intervention subject to these

26 conditions, they shall submit a stipulation and proposed order on or before July 19, 2013. If
27 they do not agree, then the Court will hold a hearing on July 29, 2013, at 10:00 AM, at
28 which time the parties and Proposed Intervenors shall address why they believe an order

1 allowing intervention with the above conditions is not within this Court’s discretion. The
2 July 22, 2013 hearing is hereby VACATED.
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated: 07/15/13
7

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2