Rollins v. Dignity Health et al

Filing 74

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/15/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
NICOLE A. DILLER (SBN 154842)
ROBERTA H. VESPREMI (SBN 225067)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
CHARLES JACKSON (appearance pro hac vice)
ALLYSON N. HO (appearance pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
77 West Wacker Drive, Fifth Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312.324.1001
Attorneys for Defendants Dignity Health, Herbert J.
Vallier, and the Retirement Plans Sub-Committee

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17

STARLA ROLLINS on behalf of herself,
individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

18
19
20
21
22
23

Case No. 13-C-1450 TEH
STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff,
v.
DIGNITY HEALTH, a California non-profit
corporation, HERBERT J. VALLIER,
an individual, the members of the Dignity
Retirement Committee, and JOHN and
JANE DOES, each an individual, 1-20,
Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

1.

2

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Defendants contend that disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to

3

involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special

4

protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this

5

litigation may be warranted. Although Plaintiff disputes this contention, the parties hereby

6

stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties

7

acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to

8

discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the

9

limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal

10

principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this

11

Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil

12

Local Rule 79-5 set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be

13

applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

14

2.

15
16

DEFINITIONS
2.1

Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.

17

2.2

“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

18

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule

19

of Civil Procedure 26(c).

20
21

2.3

well as their support staff).

22
23

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as

2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that

it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”

24

2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

25

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,

26

testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or

27

responses to discovery in this matter.

28

///

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

2

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a

3

consultant in this action.

4
5

2.7

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

6
7

House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

2.8

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.

8

2.9

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

9

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action

10

on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.

11
12

2.10

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).

13
14

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

2.11

Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.

15

2.12

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

16

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

17

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and

18

subcontractors.

19
20

2.13

Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”

21

2.14

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

22

Producing Party.

23

3.

24

SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

25

(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2)

26

all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

27

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

28

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a

2

Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as

3

a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the

4

public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party

5

prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who

6

obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating

7

Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

8

4.

DURATION

9

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by

10

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court

11

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all

12

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after

13

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,

14

including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to

15

applicable law.

16

5.

17

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

18

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care

19

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

20

The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents,

21

items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material,

22

documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

23

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

24

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are

25

shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

26

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary

27

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

28

///

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated

2

for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other

3

Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

4

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

5

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

6

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so

7

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

8

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

9

(a)

for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,

10

but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

11

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only a

12

portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

13

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

14

margins). A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for

15

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated

16

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the

17

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed

18

“CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and

19

produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for

20

protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party

21

must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a

22

portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

23

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

24

margins).

25

(b)

for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings,

26

that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or

27

other proceeding, all protected testimony.

28

///

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

(c)

for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any

2

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

3

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.”

4

If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to

5

the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

6

5.3

Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

7

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

8

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

9

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

10

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

11

6.

12

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

13

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

14

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

15

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

16

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

17

original designation is disclosed.

18

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution

19

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis

20

for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written

21

notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this

22

specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in

23

good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other

24

forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In

25

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality

26

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the

27

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,

28

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

5

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or

2

establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in

3

a timely manner.

4

6.3

Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

5

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under

6

Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days

7

of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer

8

process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be

9

accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet

10

and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to

11

make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable)

12

shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In

13

addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any

14

time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition

15

transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be

16

accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet

17

and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

18

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

19

Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

20

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to

21

sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to

22

file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the

23

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s

24

designation until the court rules on the challenge.

25

7.

26

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

27

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

28

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

6

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

2

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL

3

DISPOSITION).

4

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and

5

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

6

7.2

Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered

7

by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

8

information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

9

(a)

the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as

10

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the

11

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

12

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

13

(b)

the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the

14

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

15

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

16

(c)

Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

17

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment

18

and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

19

(d)

the court and its personnel;

20

(e)

court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock

21

jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation

22

and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

23

(f)

during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is

24

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

25

(Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of

26

transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be

27

separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted

28

under this Stipulated Protective Order;

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

7

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1
2

(g)

the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;

3

(h)

any designated mediator who is assigned to hear this litigation, or who has

4

been selected by the Parties, and his or her staff, who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

5

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and

6

(i)

any person designated by mutual agreement of the Parties who has

7

executed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), or by Order of the

8

Court.

9

8.

10

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
LITIGATION

11

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

12

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party

13

must:

14
15
16

(a)

within two weeks notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification

shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b)

within two weeks notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or

17

order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or

18

order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated

19

Protective Order; and

20
21
22

(c)

cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by

the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

23

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as

24

“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order

25

issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party

26

shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material –

27

and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving

28

Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

8

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

9.

2

A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS
LITIGATION
(a)

3

The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-

4

Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-

5

Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this

6

Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking

7

additional protections.
(b)

8
9

In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to

produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an

10

agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the

11

Party shall:
(1)

12

promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party

13

that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-

14

Party;
(2)

15

promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated

16

Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific

17

description of the information requested; and
(3)

18
19

make the information requested available for inspection by the

Non-Party.
(c)

20

If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court

21

within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may

22

produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-

23

Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its

24

possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

25

determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

26

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

27

///

28

///

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

9

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

10.

2

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

3

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

4

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

5

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the

6

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

7

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

8

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9

11.

10

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

11
12

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the

13

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This

14

provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery

15

order that provides for production without prior privilege review. The parties incorporate their

16

agreement reached pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) as memorialized in the Stipulated

17

Order Regarding Electronic Discovery entered by the Court on October 4, 2013.

18

12.

19
20
21

MISCELLANEOUS
12.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the court in the future.
12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

22

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

23

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

24

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered

25

by this Protective Order.

26

12.3

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party

27

or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in

28

the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

10

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed

2

under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at

3

issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request

4

establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or

5

otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected

6

Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then the

7

Receiving Party may file the information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)

8

unless otherwise instructed by the court.

9

13.

10

FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each

11

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such

12

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,

13

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

14

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must

15

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the

16

Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all

17

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2)affirms that the Receiving Party has

18

not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or

19

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to

20

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts,

21

legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work

22

product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected

23

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to

24

this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

25

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

11

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

Dated: October 10, 2013

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

2
3
4
5
6
7

By: _/s/ Nicole A. Diller_________________
Nicole A. Diller
Roberta H. Vespremi
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Charles Jackson (appearance pro hac vice)
Allyson N. Ho (appearance pro hac vice)
77 West Wacker Drive, Fifth Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312.324.1001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendants Dignity Health,
Herbert J. Vallier, and the Retirement Plans
Sub-Committee

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

12

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

Dated: October 10, 2013

KELLER ROHRBACK, LLP

2
3

By:

4
5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Matthew Gerend
Lynn Lincoln Sarko
Havila Unrein
Matthew Gerend
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, Washington 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206.623.3384
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
KELLER ROHRBACK, LLP
Juli E. Farris
1129 State Street, Suite 8
Santa Barbara, California 93101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 805.456.1497
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13

KELLER ROHRBACK, PLC
Ron Kilgard
3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 602.248.2822
[e-mail]

14
15
16
17

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL,
PLLC
Bruce Rinaldi
Karen L. Handorf
Monya M. Bunch
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500, West Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.408.4699
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Attorneys for Plaintiff Starla Rollins

25
26
27

I attest that I have obtained Matthew Gerend’s concurrence in the filing of this document.
Dated: October 10, 2013

/s/ Nicole A. Diller
Nicole A. Diller

28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

13

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

10/15
Dated: ____________, 2013

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

C13-1450

H

ER

6

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

FO

RT

5

son

. Hender

helton E

Judge T

LI

NO

4

A

3

R NIA

___________________________
HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
S

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED

1

C

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

14

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ [print or

4

type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand

5

the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the

6

Northern District of California on [date] in the case of ___________ [insert formal name of the

7

case and the number and initials assigned to it by the court]. I agree to comply with and to be

8

bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that

9

failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I

10

solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to

11

this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the

12

provisions of this Order.

13

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern

14

District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order,

15

even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

16

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

17

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone

18

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any

19

proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

20
21

Date: ______________________________________

22

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

23

Printed name: _______________________________

24

Signature: __________________________________

25
26
27

DB1/ 76059783.2

28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

15

STIPULATED [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 13-C-1450 TEH