Brown et al v. Alexander et al

Filing 150

FURTHER DISCOVERY ORDER: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/24/2016 at 9:30 AM. Show Cause Response due by 3/23/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/17/2016. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

John M. Vrieze, CSB #115397
William F. Mitchell, CSB #159831
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
Attorneys at Law
814 Seventh Street
P. O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Alexander, Wilson,
Fleshman, Cain, Salatnay and County of Del Norte

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

BARRY BROWN, JENNIFER BROWN,
JANE DOE 1, and JANE DOE 2,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17

Case No.: CV 13-1451 - RS (LB)
[PROPOSED] FURTHER DISCOVERY
ORDERS

vs.
JON ALEXANDER, DEAN WILSON,
ED FLESHMAN, JULIE CAIN,
CINDY SALATNAY, COUNTY OF DEL
NORTE, and DONALD CROCKETT
Defendants.

18
19

The order to show cause hearing regarding plaintiff’s repeated failures to comply

20

with the Court’s prior discovery orders was held March 10, 2016, before Magistrate

21

Judge Laurel Beeler.

22

William Mitchell was present for the County defendants, and Thomas Petersen

23

appeared by phone. Attorney Patricia Barry failed to appear by phone or in person for

24

the scheduled hearing.

25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502

The Court orders plaintiff Jennifer Brown, through her counsel Patricia Barry, to
do the following on or before March 23, 2016:

1
________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] FURTHER DISCOVERY ORDERS

1
2
3

1. Plaintiff shall provide verified responses to interrogatories propounded by the
County of Del Norte, originally propounded on August 26, 2015;
2. Plaintiff shall provide response to each request in the County of Del Norte’s

4

request for production of documents (“RFP”) originally propounded on August 26, 2015.

5

If plaintiff does not possess documents (in either paper or electronic form) responsive to a

6

requests, then the response shall so state for that request. Otherwise, the documents must

7

be produced to defendants;

8
9

3. Plaintiff shall provide response to each request in the County of Del Norte’s
RFP originally propounded on February 24, 2015. If plaintiff does not possess

10

documents (in either paper or electronic form) responsive to a request, then the response

11

shall so state for that request. Otherwise, the documents must be produced to defendants;

12

4. In response to defendant Alexander’s RFP (Set Two), Nos. 1 & 3, plaintiff

13

responded, “I will produce these track phone records related to this request.” Plaintiff

14

shall produce these documents to defendants. If plaintiff is unable to retrieve this

15

information from her phone, and did not retain the billing statements for the subject track

16

phones, then plaintiff shall list the phone numbers and service provider for the track

17

phones referenced in the aforementioned response;

18

5. In response to defendant Fleshmans’s RFP (Set Two), Nos. 1 & 3, plaintiff

19

responded, “I will produce these track phone records related to this request.” Plaintiff

20

shall produce these documents to defendants. If plaintiff is unable to retrieve this

21

information from her phone, and did not retain the billing statements for the subject track

22

phones, then plaintiff shall list the phone numbers and service provider for the track

23

phones referenced in the aforementioned response.

24

The Court further orders a further hearing on the Court’s Order to Show Cause on

25

March 24, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom C, 15th floor, at which time plaintiff’s

26

counsel shall confirm compliance with the above orders, Nos. 1-5.

MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502

2
________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] FURTHER DISCOVERY ORDERS

1

DATED: March 15, 2016

MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP

2
By:

3
4

/s/ William F. Mitchell
William F. Mitchell
Attorneys for Defendants Alexander,
Wilson, Fleshman, and County of Del Norte

5

S
UNIT
ED

VED
APPRO
aur
Judge L

10

LI

ER

H

13

RT

12

A

11

r

el Beele

FO

9

NO

8

Date: March 17, 2016

RT
U
O

7

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

6

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502

3
________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] FURTHER DISCOVERY ORDERS