Blue Growth Holdings Ltd v. Mainstreet Limited Ventures, LLC et al

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Continue Plaintiff Blue Growth Holdings Ltd.s Deadline To File A Reply In Support Of Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Blue Growth Holdings Ltd. Reset Deadlines as to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof. Replies due by 6/25/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/19/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Joshua D. Wayser (Cal. Bar No. 152711)
[e-mail]
Pamela Tsao (Cal. Bar No. 266734)
[e-mail]
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
310.788.4471
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Blue Growth Holdings Ltd.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

BLUE GROWTH HOLDINGS LTD.,
a company organized under the laws of the
British Virgin Islands,

)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MAINSTREET LIMITED VENTURES, LLC, )
a Limited Liability Company organized under )
the laws of the State of California; JOSEPH M. )
AARON, an individual; DOES 1-50 inclusive, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. CASE NO. 3:13-cv-01452-CRB
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF
BLUE GROWTH HOLDINGS LTD.’S
DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF’S REPLY ISO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT -

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Blue Growth Holdings Ltd.

2

(“Plaintiff) and Defendants Mainstreet Limited Ventures, LLC and Joseph Aaron (collectively

3

“Defendants”) by and through their attorneys of record that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply

4
In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment Or In The Alternative Summary
5
6

Adjudication shall be continued under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 6(b) from June 18,

7

2013 to June 25, 2013. Good cause exists for granting the extension as Plaintiff’s counsel will be

8

unexpectedly traveling prior to and during Plaintiff’s deadline to file its reply.

9
SO STIPULATED.
10
Respectfully submitted,
11
Dated: June 14, 2013

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

12
13

By:
/s/ Joshua D. Wayser
Joshua D. Wayser
Pamela Tsao
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BLUE GROWTH HOLDINGS, LTD.

14
15
16

Dated: June 14, 2013

theDewberryfirm

17
By:
/s/ Robert H. Dewberry
Robert H. Dewberry
Attorneys for Defendants
MAINSTREET LIMITED VENTURES, LLC;
JOSEPH M. AARON

18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED as follows:

21

H

ER

FO

er

CHARLES R. BREYER les R. Brey
har
Judge C
United States District Judge
RT

28

Dated: June 19, 2013

NO

27

D

A

26

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

LI

IT IS SO ORDERED.
25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

2013.

RT
U
O

24

Judgment Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication is continued from June 18, 2013 to June 25,

S

23

The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary

UNIT
ED

22

C
F
D I OTION COR OUMMARY JUDGMENT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF’S REPLY ISO MS T R I F T S
1

N