Dhillon v. Doe 1 et al

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 HARMEET DHILLON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. C 13-1465 SI ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY v. DOE 1, an unknown individual, and DOES 2-10, Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff’s administrative motions for leave to take early discovery are scheduled for a hearing 18 on November 7, 2013. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matters are 19 appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth 20 below, plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. 21 Plaintiff seeks leave to issue two subpoenas, one directed at an attorney and one directed at 22 Google, Inc., in order to learn the identity of “Doe 1” to facilitate service of process on Doe 1. The 23 complaint alleges that Doe 1 anonymously published an article titled “Meet Harmeet” on the website 24 www.mungergames.net, and that the article featured a copyrighted photograph of plaintiff. Doe 1, 25 appearing through counsel, opposes the administrative motions on numerous grounds, including that 26 they are unnecessary because Doe 1’s counsel has informed plaintiff’s counsel that she will accept 27 service of process on behalf of Doe 1. Doe 1 also states that he/she has “immediate plans” to file a 28 motion to dismiss and/or a motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s copyright infringement claim. 1 Based upon these representations by Doe 1, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s administrative motions 2 as unnecessary. Counsel for Doe 1 is ORDERED to accept service of process on Doe 1; and Doe 1 is 3 directed to promptly file a motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment. 4 This order resolves Docket Nos. 20 and 24. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: November 4, 2013 9 SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?