Dhillon v. Doe 1 et al
Filing
42
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
HARMEET DHILLON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. C 13-1465 SI
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO TAKE
EARLY DISCOVERY
v.
DOE 1, an unknown individual, and DOES 2-10,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiff’s administrative motions for leave to take early discovery are scheduled for a hearing
18
on November 7, 2013. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matters are
19
appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth
20
below, plaintiff’s motions are DENIED.
21
Plaintiff seeks leave to issue two subpoenas, one directed at an attorney and one directed at
22
Google, Inc., in order to learn the identity of “Doe 1” to facilitate service of process on Doe 1. The
23
complaint alleges that Doe 1 anonymously published an article titled “Meet Harmeet” on the website
24
www.mungergames.net, and that the article featured a copyrighted photograph of plaintiff. Doe 1,
25
appearing through counsel, opposes the administrative motions on numerous grounds, including that
26
they are unnecessary because Doe 1’s counsel has informed plaintiff’s counsel that she will accept
27
service of process on behalf of Doe 1. Doe 1 also states that he/she has “immediate plans” to file a
28
motion to dismiss and/or a motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s copyright infringement claim.
1
Based upon these representations by Doe 1, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s administrative motions
2
as unnecessary. Counsel for Doe 1 is ORDERED to accept service of process on Doe 1; and Doe 1 is
3
directed to promptly file a motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment.
4
This order resolves Docket Nos. 20 and 24.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: November 4, 2013
9
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?