Francis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 27

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/23/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/23/2013: # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service Additional address) (lmh, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 ADLEAN FRANCIS, Case No. 13-cv-01482 NC 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiff, 13 v. Re: Dkt. No. 26 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 14, 2013, Wells Fargo moved to dismiss all claims in the second amended 18 19 complaint filed by Francis. Dkt. Nos. 20, 22. When Francis failed to respond to Wells 20 Fargo’s motion by the July 1, 2013 deadline as required by the local rules, the Court issued 21 an order giving Francis until July 19, 2013 to file an opposition or a statement of 22 nonopposition, and to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Dkt. No. 26. 23 The order explained that Francis’s failure to respond will result in dismissal of this case 24 with prejudice. Id. Francis has not responded to the motion to dismiss or the Court’s order 25 to show cause. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this case with prejudice. The parties have 26 consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 27 Dkt. Nos. 12, 16. 28 // Case No. 13-cv-01482 NC ORDER DISMISSING CASE 1 Th hearing on the moti to dismi set for Ju 24, 2013 is vacated he o ion iss uly d. 2 Th clerk is ordered to terminate ca No. 13-cv-01482 N he o t ase NC. 3 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 4 Date: July 23 2013 3, 5 ____ __________ __________ _____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge 6 7 8 9 10 0 11 1 12 2 13 3 14 4 15 5 16 6 17 7 18 8 19 9 20 0 21 1 22 2 23 3 24 4 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 8 Case No. 13-cv-0148 NC 82 ORDER DISMISSIN CASE R NG 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?