Schmidt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 25

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re 17 Renotice motion hearing, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 6 MOTION to Dismiss The Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

LONNIE G. SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13

No. C 13-01509 WHA

v.

ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., NDEx WEST,
LLC, and DOES 1–25, inclusive,
Defendants.

14

/

15

On April 12, 2013, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a motion to dismiss.

16

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due

17

by April 29. None was received. On April 19, the action was reassigned to the undersigned

18

judge. Defendant has renoticed the motion for hearing on June 20. Accordingly, the following

19

briefing schedule is hereby set: plaintiffs’ response to the motion to dismiss is due by NOON ON

20

MAY 30. The reply is due NOON ON JUNE 6.

21

For the benefit of plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, the parties are on notice that failure

22

to timely respond to the motion to dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the action

23

being dismissed for failure to prosecute.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: May 20, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE