Chartis Specialty Insurance Company et al v. United States of America

Filing 96

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 94 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION filed by Whittaker Corporation Case Management Statement due by 5/29/2014. Further Case Management Conference reset for 6/5/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/1/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, for itself and as subrogee of Whittaker Corporation; and WHITTAKER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 18 Defendant. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-13-10527-EMC Honorable Edward M. Chen [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Proposed Order.docx -1Case No. CV-13-10527-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1 Having reviewed the stipulation and the file and pleadings at issue 2 herein, the COURT HEREBY ORDERS the parties to participate in a 3 settlement conference before a magistrate judge to be identified by this Court 4 on the issue of liability under CERCLA and, potentially, a preliminary 5 allocation of any such liability. This settlement conference shall occur after 6 May 1, 2014. by 5/15/14. Further CMC reset for 6/5/14 at 10:30 a.m. 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 ISTRIC TC lst April DATED this ____ day of ____________, 2014.ES D T D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF Honorable Edward M. Chen AS MO 11 12 United States District Court Judge ER 16 A H 15 FO dwar Judge E LI RT 14 en d M. Ch NO 13 R NIA TA UNIT ED 10 RT U O S 9 N D IS T IC T R OF C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Proposed Order.docx -2Case No. CV-13-10527-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?