Chartis Specialty Insurance Company et al v. United States of America
Filing
96
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 94 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION filed by Whittaker Corporation Case Management Statement due by 5/29/2014. Further Case Management Conference reset for 6/5/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/1/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
CHARTIS SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois
corporation, for itself and as subrogee
of Whittaker Corporation; and
WHITTAKER CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation,
15
16
Plaintiff,
vs.
17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
18
Defendant.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV-13-10527-EMC
Honorable Edward M. Chen
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ALTERNATIVE
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Proposed Order.docx
-1Case No. CV-13-10527-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1
Having reviewed the stipulation and the file and pleadings at issue
2
herein, the COURT HEREBY ORDERS the parties to participate in a
3
settlement conference before a magistrate judge to be identified by this Court
4
on the issue of liability under CERCLA and, potentially, a preliminary
5
allocation of any such liability. This settlement conference shall occur after
6
May 1, 2014. by 5/15/14. Further CMC reset for 6/5/14 at 10:30 a.m.
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
ISTRIC
TC
lst
April
DATED this ____ day of ____________, 2014.ES D
T
D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
Honorable Edward M. Chen
AS MO
11
12
United States District Court Judge
ER
16
A
H
15
FO
dwar
Judge E
LI
RT
14
en
d M. Ch
NO
13
R NIA
TA
UNIT
ED
10
RT
U
O
S
9
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Proposed Order.docx
-2Case No. CV-13-10527-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?