McBride et al v. Mylan, Inc.

Filing 49

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 43 Motion for Attorney Fees.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 Geoffrey Spellberg (SBN: 121079) gspellberg@meyersnave.com 2 Kevin P. McLaughlin (SBN: 251477) kmclaughlin@meyersnave.com 3 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 555 12th Street, Suite 1500 4 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 808-2000 5 Facsimile: (510) 444-1108 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael McBride, Mario Valdez, Pedro Garcia, 7 Kenny Spencer, Robert Ryan 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL MCBRIDE, MARIO VALDEZ, PEDRO GARCIA, KENNY SPENCER, 12 ROBERT RYAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 MYLAN, INC, and DOES 1 through 50 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Case No. 13-CV-01533-VC CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE AWARDS Date: Time: Courtroom: October 2, 2014 1:30 p.m. 4, 17th Floor Judge Vince Chhabria 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2315703.1 13-CV-01533-VC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE AWARDS 1 The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees, 2 Reimbursement of Expenses and Class Representative Incentive Awards and the memorandum 3 and declarations in support thereof, and after hearing, hereby finds that: 4 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses and Class 5 Representative Incentive Awards (the "Motion") requests an award of attorneys’ fees of 6 approximately 25% of Settlement Fund in the amount of $56,319.85 and reimbursement of out7 of-pocket litigation costs and expenses in the amount of $5,680.15. Class Counsel also requests 8 that the Court award $3,000 each to the Class Representatives Michael McBride, Mario Valdez, 9 Pedro Garcia, Kenny Spencer, and Robert Ryan. 10 2. The Court finds that the amount of fees requested is fair and reasonable under the 11 percentage-of-recovery approach and cross checked by the lodestar method. 12 3. The attorneys’ fees requested were entirely contingent upon success. Class 13 Counsel risked time and effort and advanced costs and expenses with no ultimate guarantee of 14 compensation. 15 4. Notices outlining Class Counsels’ requests were provided to 48 Class Members. 16 No objections were received. 17 5. Upon consideration of the Motion and accompanying Declarations and based upon 18 all matters of record including the pleadings and papers filed in this action, the Court hereby finds 19 that the $56,319.85 in fees and $5,680.15 in costs that are requested are reasonable and proper. 20 Further, the Court finds that awarding incentive payments of $3,000 each to the named Class 21 Representatives is reasonable. 22 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that: 23 1. Class Counsel are awarded attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $62,000, to be 24 distributed as set forth in the Court’s Order re Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class 25 Settlement. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2315703.1 13-CV-01533-VC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE AWARDS 1 2. Class Representatives Michael McBride, Mario Valdez, Pedro Garcia, Kenny 2 Spencer, and Robert Ryan are awarded Service Payments of $3,000 each, to be distributed as set 3 forth in the Court’s Order re Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement. 4 RT 10 ER 12 A H 11 R NIA _______________________ HON. VINCE CHHABRIA DISTRICT JUDGE ia Chhabr e Vi n c e Judg FO NO 9 DERED O OR IT IS S LI 7 Dated: October ___, 2014 8 UNIT ED 7 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 S 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2315703.1 13-CV-01533-VC 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE AWARDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?