Sadowski v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.

Filing 6

ORDER GRANTING re 5 Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint filed by HowMedica Osteonics Corp.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/2/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

SEDGWICK LLP
RALPH A. CAMPILLO (State Bar No. 70376)
[e-mail]
ARAMEH ZARGHAM O'BOYLE (State Bar No. 239495)
[e-mail]
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556
Telephone:
213.426.6900
Facsimile:
213.426.6921
SEDGWICK LLP
WAYNE A. WOLFF (State Bar No. 161351)
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-2806
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
(sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics)

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

JOHN SADOWSKI,

16
17
18

Case No. 3:13-cv-1549-JCS
Plaintiff(s),

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

v.
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. d/b/a
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS,

19
Defendant(s).
20
21
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff John Sadowski (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant
Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics),
by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to a thirty (30) day extension of time
for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly, Defendant shall have until, and
including, May 31, 2013, to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
So Stipulated.
1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
LA/2227914v1

1

DATED: April 30, 2013

SEDGWICK LLP

2
By: /s/ Arameh Zargham O’Boyle
Arameh Zargham O'Boyle
Ralph A. Campillo
Wayne A. Wolff
Attorneys for Defendant
Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica
Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics)

3
4
5
6
7
8

DATED: April 30, 2013

LEVIN SIMES LLP

9
By: /s/ Rachel Abrams
Rachel Abrams
William A. Levin
Lauren L. Simes
Attorneys for Plaintiff John Sadowksi

10
11

NO

RT

Judge Jo

ER

18

RDERE

D

ero

Sp
seph C.

A

H

17

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

16

Dated: 5/2/13

LI

UNIT
ED

S

15

14

RT
U
O

13

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

FO

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
LA/2227914v1

1

PROOF OF SERVICE
John Sadowski v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., et al.
USDC-NDCA; Case No. 3:13-cv-1549-JCS

2
3
4

I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party
to the within action. My business address is Sedgwick LLP, 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556. On April 30, 2013, I served the within document(s):

5

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

6
7



FACSIMILE - by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the
fax number(s) set forth on the attached Telecommunications Cover Page(s) on this
date before 5:00 p.m.



MAIL - by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage
thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California
addressed as set forth below.

X

ELECTRONIC – by electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to
the electronic notification address(es) of the addressee(s) listed below.



OVERNIGHT COURIER - by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed
envelope with shipping prepaid, and depositing in a collection box for next day
delivery to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below via [delivery method] .

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Attorneys For Plaintiff
JOHN SADOWSKI

William A. Levin, Esq.
Laurel L. Simes, Esq.
Rachel Abrams, Esq.
LEVINE SIMES LLP
353 Sacramento Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Fascimile: [phone]

20
21
22
23
24

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence
for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same
day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage
meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose
direction the service was made.

25
Executed on April 30, 2013, at Los Angeles, California.
26
/s/Barbara Fergerson ________________________
Barbara Fergerson

27
28

3
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
LA/2227914v1