Smith v. Lux Retail North America, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES [re 20 First MOTION to Strike PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE ALL AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN LUX RETAIL NORTH AMERICA, INC.S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Emily Smith]. The 6/13/2013 (8:00 AM) hearing will remain on calendar to address the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/22/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

EMILY SMITH, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
No. C 13-01579 WHA
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14
15

ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO STRIKE
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

LUX RETAIL NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,
Defendants.
/

16
17

Plaintiff filed a motion to strike affirmative defenses (Dkt. No. 20). In response,

18

defendant filed an amended answer. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike affirmative

19

defenses is DENIED AS MOOT. The June 13 hearing date will remain on calendar to address the

20

issue of subject matter jurisdiction.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: May 22, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE