Shwartzmiller et al v. Brown et al
Filing
9
ORDER REOPENING CASE; ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/28/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2013)
1
*E-Filed 5/28/13*
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
8
9
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
No. C 13-1582 RS (PR)
ORDER REOPENING ACTION;
v.
ORDER OF TRANSFER
EDMUND G. BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff’s motion to alter the judgment (Docket No. 8), which the Court construes as a
16
motion to reopen the action, is GRANTED. The judgment (Docket No. 7), and the order of
17
dismissal (Docket No. 6), are VACATED.
18
Plaintiffs, whose claims arise from events in the County of San Diego, first sought to
19
intervene in Plata v. Brown, 01-1351-TEH. Now they wish to initiate a new class action.
20
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this federal civil rights action is hereby TRANSFERRED to
21
the Southern District of California, wherein venue properly lies because a substantial part of
22
the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred, and the defendants named reside,
23
in that district. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(b) and 1391(b). The Clerk shall transfer this action
24
forthwith. The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 8.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 28, 2013
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
28
No. C 13-1582 RS (PR)
ORDER OF TRANSFER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?