Subramani v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadlines as to 11 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Responses due by 9/5/2013. Replies due by 9/12/2013. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 08/23/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)

1 Law Offices of Mark W. Lapham
Mark W. Lapham, ESQ. (SBN 146352)
2 751 Diablo Rd.
Danville, California 94526
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5 KARTHIK SUBRAMANI
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
Case No. C 13-01605
Honorable Judge Samuel Conti
Date: September 27, 2013
Time: 10:00 a.m..
Courtroom: 1 17th floor

11 KARTHIK SUBRAMANI
Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.

14

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
15 ASOCIATION; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive.
16
Defendant(s).
17
18
19

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE FOR
OPPOSITION AND REPLY DUE DATES
TO DISMISS
Complaint Filed: April 9, 2013

STIPULATION
Plaintiffs and Defendants, hereby stipulate through their respective counsel as follows:

20 That
th

21

reply would be

22 due 7 days thereafter. The hearing is calendared for September 27, 2013. That because of existing
th
23 scheduling, the parties agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file an opposition until September 5

24
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /

eply until September 12th.

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3 Dated: August 20th, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF MARK W. LAPHAM

4
By:

5
6

//s/Mark W. Lapham__________________
MARK W. LAPHAM, SBN 146352
Attorney for Plaintiff
KARTHIK SUBRAMANI

7
8 Dated: August 20, 2013

SEVERSON AND WERSON, PC

9

//s/Gurinder S. Grewal__________________
GURINDER S. GREWAL, SBN 277975
ONE EMBARACADERO CENTER, SUITE 2600
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
Attorney for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK

By:

10
11
12
13

ORDER

14
15

The extension of time for Plaintiff to file their opposition is granted to September 5th, 2013

16 and Defendants time to file their reply is extended until September 12, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

S
20

UNIT
ED

19

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA 08/23/2013

By: ________________________
HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

R NIA

17

21

24

LI
A

H

ER

FO

am
Judge S

RT

23

ti
uel Con

NO

22

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE
DATES