Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Filing
34
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/12/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
13
14
15
16
THERESA MILLER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C 13-01622 RS
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
17
18
In response to defendant’s motion to dismiss this action, plaintiff filed what she docketed as
19
a “response” but which appears in ECF as merely another copy of defendant’s moving papers. She
20
subsequently also filed a motion to remand. By prior written order, the motion to remand was
21
denied, and plaintiff was expressly advised that she had failed to oppose the motion to dismiss, and
22
she was given additional time to do so. Plaintiff failed to file such an opposition, or otherwise
23
respond to the order.
24
Thereafter, plaintiff filed a notice of bankruptcy filing. Additionally, in its case
25
management conference statement, defendant reports that its efforts to contact plaintiff’s counsel
26
have been unsuccessful. These circumstances reflect a clear abandonment by plaintiff of any effort
27
to prosecute this action. Furthermore, while the automatic stay arising from a bankruptcy filing
28
applies only to actions brought against the debtor, plaintiff likely lost standing to pursue this suit
1
absent involvement of the bankruptcy trustee. Accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed, without
2
prejudice, and the Clerk shall close the file
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: 9/12/13
7
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?