Kuhnau et al v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
Filing
57
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 27 MOTION to Remand to Remand Action to State Court of California filed by Diana Williams, Donald Kuhnau, Jeanene Kuhnau (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JEANENE KUHNAU, et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-13-1669 EMC
ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., et al.,
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
Plaintiffs have moved the Court to remand the current case back to state court, which was
16
removed to federal court by Defendant Crane Co. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1442(a)(1). See
17
Docket No. 27.
18
Plaintiffs contend they have tried unsuccessfully to obtain a stipulation from Defendant
19
Crane Co. to remand the current action. The terms of such stipulation are similar to a unilateral
20
waiver of certain claims upon which this Court based its decision to remand in Pratt v. Asbestos
21
Corp., Ltd., 11-cv-3503 EMC, 2011 WL 4433724 (Docket No. 9).
22
Accordingly, the Court hereby orders as follows. The parties are hereby ordered to show
23
cause why the case should not be remanded back to state court upon stipulation or Plaintiff’s
24
filing of an appropriate waver (as in Pratt). Both parties shall have until 5:00 p.m., June 12, 2013,
25
to jointly file and serve a response to this order to show cause. There shall be no reply brief.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Plaintiff’s filing shall include any stipulation or waiver it intends to file. Absent further order of the
2
Court, the Court will take the matter under submission without hearing.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 7, 2013
7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?