Triumph Furniture Processing-Export Joint Stock Company v. Everest Furniture Company
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED FOR IMPROPER VENUE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
TRIUMPH FURNITURE PROCESSINGEXPORT JOINT STOCK COMPANY,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED FOR
IMPROPER VENUE
Plaintiff,
10
11
No. C 13-01729 SI
v.
12
EVEREST FURNITURE COMPANY and
DOES 1-20,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
On April 17, 2013, plaintiff Triumph filed this breach of contract action, alleging that Everest
16
had failed to pay for furniture that Triumph had delivered to Everest. Everest did not answer or respond
17
to the complaint, and Triumph was granted and entry of default by the clerk, and has moved for default
18
judgment.
19
Triumph is a Vietnamese corporation, and Everest is a corporation based in Fresno, California
20
which is located in the Eastern District of California. Triumph has not alleged any facts that would
21
show that venue is proper in this district, the Northern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391.
22
Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by no later than October 3,
23
2013, why this case should not be transferred for improper venue. If plaintiff does not respond
24
adequately by October 3, 2013, this action will be transferred to the Eastern District of California for
25
further proceedings.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: September 24, 2013
28
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?