Yniguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 11, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 RICHARD YNIGUEZ, Case No.: 3:13-CV-01746-JST 12 [The Honorable Jon S. Tigar] Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 v. 15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as successor by 16 merger and acquisition of WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB and doing business as WELLS 17 FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; NBS 18 DEFAULT SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 ORDER 24 25 Based on the Joint Stipulation between plaintiff Richard Yniguez, defendant Wells Fargo 26 Bank, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia 27 Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”), and defendant NBS Default 28 Services, LLC filed on June 10, 2013, 93000/FR0870/00658964-1 D 1 CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01746-JST ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41) DISMISSING ACTION 1 AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: 2 The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party 3 will bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. The clerk shall close the case. 4 5 DATED: June 11, 2013 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0870/00658964-1 D 2 CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01746-JST ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41) DISMISSING ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?