Yniguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 11, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11 RICHARD YNIGUEZ,
Case No.: 3:13-CV-01746-JST
12
[The Honorable Jon S. Tigar]
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
14 v.
15
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as successor by
16 merger and acquisition of WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB and doing business as WELLS
17 FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a division of
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; NBS
18 DEFAULT SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
19
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
ORDER
24
25
Based on the Joint Stipulation between plaintiff Richard Yniguez, defendant Wells Fargo
26 Bank, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia
27 Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”), and defendant NBS Default
28 Services, LLC filed on June 10, 2013,
93000/FR0870/00658964-1
D
1
CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01746-JST
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT
TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41) DISMISSING ACTION
1
AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:
2
The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party
3 will bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. The clerk shall close the case.
4
5 DATED:
June 11, 2013
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR0870/00658964-1
D
2
CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01746-JST
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT
TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41) DISMISSING ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?