San Francisco Herring Association v. United States Department of the Interior et al
Filing
67
ADDITIONAL NOTICE REGARDING DECEMBER 12 HEARING. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 11, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SAN FRANCISCO HERRING
ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff,
8
11
ADDITIONAL NOTICE REGARDING
DECEMBER 12 HEARING
v.
9
10
Case No. 13-cv-01750-JST
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THE INTERIOR, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
In addition to the issues identified in the Court’s December 5 notice, the parties should also
13
be prepared to address the following additional issues in their oral argument:
14
1.
Is 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) a jurisdictional prerequisite to the Court exercising subject-
15
matter jurisdiction over this action? See Wong v. Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030, 1038 (9th
16
Cir. 2013) (en banc) (“Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Shalala, 125 F.3d 765, 770
17
(9th Cir.1997), held [28 U.S.C. § 2401] subsection (a) nonjurisdictional,
18
emphasizing that it ‘does not speak of jurisdiction, but erects only a procedural
19
bar.’”)
20
2.
21
22
If 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) is not jurisdictional, should the Court address the question of
the statute of limitations in ruling on the parties’ motions for summary judgment on
the question of N.P.S.’s jurisdiction over the waters at issue in this action?
23
24
Dated: December 11, 2013
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?