Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Reyes Drywall, Inc.

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Joint MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference filed by District Council 16 Northern California Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, James Williams, Chris Christopherson, Les Proteau, Marion Bourboulis, John Maggiore, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, District Council 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Charles Del Monte, I.U.P.A.T. Union and Industry National Pension Fund Case Management Statement due by 4/14/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/24/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/24/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)

Download PDF
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Shivani Nanda (SBN 253891) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 882-7900 4 Facsimile: (415) 882-9287 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 5 snanda@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 REYES DRYWALL, INC. and DOES 1-10, 14 inclusive; Case No.: C13-1752 EMC 15 Courtroom: Judge: Defendant. 16 17 1. JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Date: Time: Location: February 27, 2014 10:30 a.m. 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco 7, 19th Floor Honorable Edward M. Chen The parties to the above-entitled action jointly request that the Case Management 18 Conference, currently set for February 27, 2014, be continued for approximately 45 - 60 days. 19 Good cause exists for the granting of the continuance, as follows: 20 2. Defendant has made a settlement offer, which has been considered and approved 21 by Plaintiffs’ Board of Trustees. 22 3. Plaintiffs have provided Defendant a proposed Stipulated Judgment, which is under 23 review and consideration by Defendant and its counsel. 24 4. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management 25 Conference, currently scheduled for February 27, 2014, be continued for approximately 45 - 60 to 26 allow time to finalize and file the Stipulated Judgment with the Court, without the necessity of 27 further litigation. 28 -1JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C13-1752 EMC P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Reyes Drywall Inc. (Patterson) 2 REYESD2\Pleadings\C13-1752 EMC Joint Request to Continue CMC 022014.doc 1 5. There are no issues that need to be addressed by the parties at the currently 2 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s 3 time and resources, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled 4 Case Management Conference. 5 Dated: February 20, 2014 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 6 By: 7 8 /S/ Shivani Nanda Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 Dated: February 20, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE R. GORE 11 By: 12 13 /S/ George R. Gore Attorney for Defendant 14 ORDER 15 BASED ON THE FOREGOING and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Case 16 Management Conference currently set for February 27, 2014, is continued to _____________ 2014 April 24, at ______ ___.m. 10:30 a 17 25 R NIA LI ER FO hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud H 24 RT 23 DIFI AS MO NO 22 _________________________________________ D THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN RDERE UNITED IS SO O STATES DISTRICT COURT IT ED A 21 UNIT ED 20 2/25/14 Date: ____________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 19 S 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 -2JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C13-1752 EMC P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Reyes Drywall Inc. (Patterson) 2 REYESD2\Pleadings\C13-1752 EMC Joint Request to Continue CMC 022014.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?