Seong Hoon Hong v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company et al

Filing 15

SUA SPONTE ORDER OF REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/30/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 SEONG HOON HONG et al., 7 8 9 10 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 13-CV-00777 YGR SUA SPONTE ORDER OF REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED vs. CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY A/K/A American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, 11 Defendant. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 YOUNG HO WON, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 vs. CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY A/K/A American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Defendant. 18 19 SEONG HOON HONG, 20 21 Case No.: 13-CV-01029 YGR Case No.: 13-CV-01769 JCS Plaintiff, vs. 22 23 CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY A/K/A American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, 24 Defendant. 25 26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above cases are hereby referred to the Honorable 27 Judge Claudia Wilken to consider whether they are related to Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. 28 Hong et al., Case No.: 12-CV-02658. 1 Any party wishing to file a statement in support of or opposition to this referral or the 2 underlying motion to relate, Hong et al. v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, 13-CV-00777, Dkt. 3 No. 17, shall file (and serve on all parties in each of the four actions) its statement by no later than 4 Wednesday, June 5, 2013, after which the matter will be taken under submission. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 30, 2013 _________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?