Seong Hoon Hong v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company et al
Filing
15
SUA SPONTE ORDER OF REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/30/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
SEONG HOON HONG et al.,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: 13-CV-00777 YGR
SUA SPONTE ORDER OF REFERRAL TO
DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED
vs.
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
A/K/A American International Specialty
Lines Insurance Company,
11
Defendant.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
YOUNG HO WON,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
vs.
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
A/K/A American International Specialty
Lines Insurance Company,
Defendant.
18
19
SEONG HOON HONG,
20
21
Case No.: 13-CV-01029 YGR
Case No.: 13-CV-01769 JCS
Plaintiff,
vs.
22
23
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
A/K/A American International Specialty
Lines Insurance Company,
24
Defendant.
25
26
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above cases are hereby referred to the Honorable
27
Judge Claudia Wilken to consider whether they are related to Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v.
28
Hong et al., Case No.: 12-CV-02658.
1
Any party wishing to file a statement in support of or opposition to this referral or the
2
underlying motion to relate, Hong et al. v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, 13-CV-00777, Dkt.
3
No. 17, shall file (and serve on all parties in each of the four actions) its statement by no later than
4
Wednesday, June 5, 2013, after which the matter will be taken under submission.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May 30, 2013
_________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?