Touchscreen Gestures LLC v. HTC Corporation et al

Filing 72

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS by Hon. William Alsup granting 69 Motion for Leave to File.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO TOUCHSCREEN GESTURES LLC, Plaintiff, v. HTC CORPORATION, ET AL., Case No. 3:13-CV-01772-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendants. Having considered the parties briefing on this motion, the Court orders as follows: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion to File a Second Amended Complaint against HTC Corporation and HTC America (collectively “HTC”) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file its Second Amended Complaint within three days of this order. 2) Plaintiff’s claims that HTC infringes U.S. Patents Nos. 7,319,457, 8,164,575, 7,274,357, and 7,814,031 by HTC products that were accused or could have been accused by Plaintiff as the date of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 3) Defendant HTC shall serve its Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint within seven days of Plaintiff’s filing the Second Amended Complaint. 4) Defendant HTC ’s Answer shall not assert counterclaims regarding U.S. Patents Nos. 7,319,457, 8,164,575, 7,274,357, or 7,814,031. 5) Defendant HTC’s counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patents Nos. 7,319,457, 8,164,575, 7,274,357, and 7,814,031 and HTC’s counterclaim of unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 8,164,575 are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED October 16, 2013. Dated: ___________ By: Hon. William H. Alsup United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?