Adaptix, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 76

Notice of pending motion to relate cases. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 05/20/2013. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 ADAPTIX, INC., 7 Plaintiff, No. C 13-1774 PJH 8 v. NOTICE OF PENDING MOTION TO RELATE CASES 9 MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Defendants. _______________________________/ 12 Before the court is a motion to relate the following six cases: 13 1. No. 13-1774, Adaptix v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al. 14 2. No. 13-1776, Adaptix v. Apple, Inc., et al. 15 3. No. 13-1777, Adaptix v. Apple, Inc., et al. 16 4. No. 13-1778, Adaptix v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. 17 5. No. 13-1844, Adaptix v. Cellco Partnership, et al. 18 6. No. 13-2023, Adaptix v. Apple, Inc., et al. 19 The motion was filed by defendant Motorola Mobility LLC in this case, and a 20 statement of non-opposition was filed by plaintiff Adaptix. The other defendant in this case, 21 Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless) filed a statement in support of Motorola’s 22 motion. However, no other parties have filed a response - either to support relation or to 23 object to it. It appears that no notice of Motorola’s motion was given to the parties in the 24 other cases, so the court provides such notice with this order. 25 The court also notes that all parties in case no. 13-1844 have consented to proceed 26 before Magistrate Judge Grewal. While some defendants in the other Adaptix cases have 27 filed declinations to proceed before another magistrate judge, they have not indicated 28 whether they would similarly decline to proceed before Magistrate Judge Grewal. 1 2 Thus, each party is directed to file a statement, no later than May 28, 2013, addressing these two issues: 3 (1) whether the party supports or opposes Motorola’s motion to relate all six cases; 4 (2) whether the party would consent to proceed before Magistrate Judge Grewal. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: May 20, 2013 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?