United States of America v. Approximately $73,670 In United States Currency
Filing
21
ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on September 24, 2013. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 13-cv-01799-JCS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL
MATERIALS
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
APPROXIMATELY $73,670 IN UNITED
STATES CURRENCY,
Defendant.
12
13
The United States has filed a Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”) in this action for
14
judicial forfeiture. A hearing on the Motion was held on September 6, 2013. At the hearing, the
15
Court asked the United States to provide additional materials addressing: 1) discrepancies in
16
certain monetary amounts set forth in the Complaint and Motion; and 2) whether the victims
17
identified in the complaint were “potential claimants” who should have been given notice of this
18
action. In addition, the Court asked the United States to submit a copy of the “Notice of Forfeiture
19
Action” listed in the Certificate of Service filed on April 22, 2013 [Docket No. 5].
20
On September 13, 2013, the United States submitted a supplemental declaration by
21
Assistant United States Attorney Kimberly Hopkins [Docket No. 19] (“Hopkins Supp. Decl.”).
22
Ms. Hopkins addressed some of the discrepancies and explained that the victims submitted
23
Petitions for Remissions, which have been approved, and that the United States “anticipates that
24
the victims will receive the remaining loss amount claimed in their Petitions for Remission once
25
the case is resolved.” Hopkins Supp. Decl. ¶ 8. According to the supplemental declaration, “[t]he
26
victim’s affirmative choice to seek remission indicated their decision not to contest the forfeiture.”
27
The Court cannot determine, from the information provided, that the victims are not
28
“potential claimant” under the statutory scheme governing judicial forfeitures.
Further, the
United States has not provided a copy of the Notice of Forfeiture Action, as the Court requested at
2
oral argument. The Court therefore requests that the United States provide the following additional
3
materials in support of its Motion: 1) the Notice of Forfeiture Action requested at the September
4
6, 2013 hearing; 2) a copy of the notice of administrative forfeiture that was sent to the victims,
5
referenced in paragraph 5 of the Hopkins Supp. Decl.; 3) copies of the Petitions for Remission that
6
were filed by the victims, also referenced in paragraph 5 of the Hopkins Supp. Decl.; and 4) a
7
copy of any written decisions or notifications reflecting the approval of the petitions and/or setting
8
forth the procedures and conditions of the payment to the victims. In addition, the United States is
9
requested to provide a supplemental brief, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing legal authority
10
in support of its contention that the actions of the victims in the administrative proceeding excuse
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
1
the United States from the notice requirements that apply in judicial forfeiture actions. The
12
additional materials requested by the Court shall be filed by October 11, 2013.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
Dated: September 24, 2013
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?