Haskins v. Symantec Corporation

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT SYMANTEC CORPORATIONS MOTION TO DISMISS re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendant Symantec Corporation's Motion to Dismiss filed by Symantec Corporation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 22 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Symantec Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities. Responses due by 7/25/2013. Replies due by 8/15/2013. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 27, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB NO. 115163)
[e-mail]
TYLER G. NEWBY (CSB NO. 205790)
[e-mail]
LESLIE A. KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313)
[e-mail]
MOLLY R. MELCHER (CSB No. 272950)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.281.1350
Attorneys for Defendant
SYMANTEC CORPORATION

LAW
AT

MOUNTAI N VI EW

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

ATTO RNEY S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

KATHLEEN HASKINS, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated,

15

Plaintiff,

16
17

v.

Case No.: 3:13-cv-01834-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT
SYMANTEC CORPORATION’S
MOTION TO DISMISS

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

18

Defendant.

Judge: The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

19
20

STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2013, Plaintiff Kathleen Haskins (“Plaintiff”) filed her

21
22

Complaint against Defendant Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”);
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2013, Symantec and Plaintiff (collectively, “the Parties”) filed a

23
24

stipulation extending Symantec’s time to respond to the Complaint to June 21, 2013 (Dkt. No.

25

15);

26

WHEREAS, on May 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 17);

27

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2013, Symantec filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First

28

Amended Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 22-23);
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

No. 3:13-cv-01834-JST

1

WHEREAS, in light of certain scheduling conflicts, the Parties have agreed, subject to the

2

approval of the Court, to extend the briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to

3

Dismiss and Symantec’s Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss;

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

LAW
AT

MOUNTAI N VI EW

ATTO RNEY S

F ENWICK & W ES T LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, Plaintiff shall have until July 25, 2013, to file her Opposition to Symantec’s
Motion to Dismiss;
WHEREAS, Symantec shall have until August 15, 2013, to file its Reply in support of its
Motion to Dismiss;
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that, subject to the Court’s availability, Symantec’s
Motion to Dismiss will be heard by the Court on August 29, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.;
WHEREAS, there are no other pending dates set by the Court that would be affected by
entry of this Order.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, and respectfully requested
that the Court order as follows:
1. Plaintiff shall have until July 25, 2013, to file her Opposition to Symantec’s Motion to
Dismiss; and
2. Symantec shall have until August 15, 2013, to file its Reply in support of its Motion to
Dismiss.
Dated: June 26, 2013

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

By /s/ Tyler G. Newby
Laurence F. Pulgram (CBS No. 115163)
[e-mail]
Tyler G. Newby (CSB No. 205790)
[e-mail]
Leslie A. Kramer (CSB No. 253313)
[e-mail]
Molly R. Melcher (CSB NO. 272950)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Ph: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Symantec Corp.

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

No. 3:13-cv-01834-JST

1

Dated: June 26, 2013

2
3
4
5
6
7

Barnow and Associates, P.C.
Ben Barnow
One North LaSalle Street, Suite 4600
Chicago, IL 60602
312-621-2000
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11

The Coffman Law Firm
Richard Lyle Coffman
505 Orleans, Suite 505
Beaumont, TX 77701
409-833-7700
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

LAW
AT

ATTO RNEY S

MOUNTAI N VI EW

12
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP

By /s/ Timothy G. Blood
Timothy G. Blood (149343)
Thomas Joseph O’Reardon II (247952)
Paula Michelle Roach (254142)
Blood Hurst & O’Reardon, LLP
701 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101
619-338-1100
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiff

16
17

ATTESTATION

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

I, Tyler G. Newby, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT SYMANTEC CORPORATION’S MOTION TO
DISMISS. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories have
concurred in this filing.
Dated: June 26, 2013

25

By /s/ Tyler G. Newby
Tyler G. Newby (CBS No. 205790)

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3

No. 3:13-cv-01834-JST

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.
3
4

Dated: June 27, 2013
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

LAW
AT

MOUNTAI N VI EW

ATTO RNEY S

F ENWICK & W ES T LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4

No. 3:13-cv-01834-JST