Haskins v. Symantec Corporation
Filing
54
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 51 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Symantec Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Class Action Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Symantec Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 5, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KATHLEEN HASKINS,
Case No. 13-cv-01834-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
Defendant.
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
Re: ECF No. 51
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint in this
14
action. ECF No. 51. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-
15
1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the
16
matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently
17
scheduled for March 13, 2014, is hereby VACATED.
18
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
19
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
20
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
21
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
22
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
23
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
24
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?