SmartData, S.A. v. Roku, Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER, Further Case Management Conference set for 9/13/13 is continued to 11/8/2013 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 9/12/13. 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Roku, Inc.. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Julie M. Holloway (Bar No. 196942)
julie.holloway@lw.com
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Richard G. Frenkel (Bar No. 204133)
rick.frenkel@lw.com
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1008
Telephone: (650) 328-4600
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
ROKU, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
CASE NO. CV 13-01838 SI
16
SMARTDATA, S.A.,
17
Plaintiff,
18
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
19
[Civil Local Rule 6-1(b)]
ROKU, INC.,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
BACKGROUND
24
Plaintiff SmartData S.A. and Defendant Roku, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”)
25
respectfully ask the Court to postpone the initial case management conference currently
26
scheduled for September 13, two days from now, as the parties are extremely close to resolving
27
their differences, and need the extra time to complete negotiations and enter a stipulated
28
dismissal with the Court.
A T T O R N E Y S A T L AW
S I L I C O N V AL L E Y
1
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. CV 13-01838 SI
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a)(2), the Parties provide the following information regarding
2
previous time modifications in this case. SmartData filed its complaint against Roku on April
3
23, 2013. The Parties stipulated for an extension of time for Roku to have through and including
4
June 17, 2013 to file its response to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Dkt. #5). Roku filed a motion to
5
dismiss (Dkt. #10), after which SmartData amended its complaint (Dkt. #19). Roku answered
6
the amended complaint on August 19, 2013. (Dkt. #26).
7
The initial case management conference has been continued on two occasions. The first
8
stipulated continuation was due to a scheduling conflict. (Dkt. #6). The Parties stipulated for the
9
second continuation in order to allow for more time for settlement discussions. (Dkt. #21).
10
Those discussions have been successful, as the Parties have engaged in productive settlement
11
discussions since stipulating to the continuation in July 2013.
12
The initial case management conference is currently set for September 13, 2013. (Dkt.
13
#24). The Parties have agreed on some aspects of an agreement to resolve this matter, and
14
believe that additional discussions in September and October 2013 will result in a settlement that
15
would dispose of this matter. To that end, the Parties respectfully request that the initial case
16
management conference be continued until November 1, 2013 with the other dates set by the
17
Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (Dkt. #2) continued
18
accordingly.1
19
STIPULATION
20
For the foregoing reasons, and pursuant to Local Rules 16-2(e) and 7-12, the Parties
21
hereto stipulate, by and through their attorneys that the initial case management conference be
22
continued to November 1, 2013, or such later date as is convenient to the Court, with the other
23
dates set by the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (Dkt.
24
#2) continued accordingly.
25
26
27
28
A T T O R N E Y S A T L AW
S I L I C O N V AL L E Y
1
The Parties have a phone call with the ADR officer scheduled for September 12 at 2:30 p.m.
pursuant to their filing of a Need for ADR Phone Call form. The Parties anticipate that if the
extra time does not result in the dismissal of this litigation, they will submit a stipulation for a
different form of ADR, which will obviate the need for an ADR phone call.
2
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. CV 13-01838 SI
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
4
5
6
Dated: September 11, 2013
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Dated: September 11, 2013
MOUNT, SPELMAN &
FINGERMAN, P.C.
LAW OFFICES OF
LARISA MIGACHYOV
7
8
9
10
11
By /s/ Larisa Migachyov
By Richard G. Frenkel
LARISA MIGACHYOV
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SMARTDATA, S.A.
RICHARD G. FRENKEL
Attorneys for Defendant
ROKU, INC.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A T T O R N E Y S A T L AW
S I L I C O N V AL L E Y
3
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. CV 13-01838 SI
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
3
A case management conference will be held on November 1, 2013, and the other dates
4
set by the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (Dkt. #2) are
5
continued accordingly.
6
9/12/13
DATED: ____________, 2013
8
7
8
9
__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A T T O R N E Y S A T L AW
S I L I C O N V AL L E Y
4
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. CV 13-01838 SI
1
ATTESTATION CLAUSE
2
I, Richard G. Frenkel, hereby attest in accordance with General Order No. 45.X(B) that
3
Larisa Migachyov, counsel for Plaintiff SMARTDATA, S.A., has provided her concurrence with
4
the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE
5
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.
6
7
Dated: September 11, 2013
8
9
10
By
Richard G. Frenkel
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A T T O R N E Y S A T L AW
S I L I C O N V AL L E Y
5
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. CV 13-01838 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?