State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR QUANTA STORAGE, INC. AND QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/18/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Keith A. Walter, Jr. (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Tel. (302) 467-4200
Fax (302) 467-4201
keith.walter@dbr.com
Minda R. Schechter (SBN 065889)
NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP
333 South Grand Ave., 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Tel. (213) 787-2500
Fax (213) 687-0498
minda.schechter@novakdruce.com
Attorneys for Defendants
QUANTA STORAGE INC. and
QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE
PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
17 ____________________________________
Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS
Case No. 3:13-cv-1877-RS
18
This Document Relates To:
19
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT
OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
v.
HITACHI-LG DATA STORAGE, INC.,
et al.
ORDER
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR QUANTA STORAGE, INC.
AND QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA,
INC. TO RESPOND TO THE STATE OF
FLORIDA’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS
MDL No. 2143
ACTIVE/ 75951828.1
DRAFT
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2014, this Court entered an Order directing that the State of
2
Florida shall have until May 19, 2014, to file a second amended complaint and that defendants
3
shall file responses to the State of Florida’s second amended complaint on or before June 18,
4
2014 (Dkt. No. 1216);
5
6
7
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2014, the State of Florida filed its Second Amended Complaint
(“Florida’s Second Amended Complaint”);
WHEREAS, defendants Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc. (“the
8
Quanta Defendants”) response to Florida’s Second Amended Complaint is currently due on June,
9
18, 2014;
10
WHEREAS the Quanta Defendants seek a one week extension of time in which to
11
respond to the State of Florida’s second amended complaint because counsel of record Keith A.
12
Walter, Zhun Lu, and Curt Lambert have recently changed law firms from Novak Druce
13
Connolly Bove + Quigg LLP to Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, which has encumbered the
14
preparation and review of the Quanta Defendants’ responsive pleading;
15
16
WHEREAS, counsel for the State of Florida have agreed that the Quanta Defendants may
have until June 25, 2014 to respond to the second amended complaint;
17
WHEREAS, counsel for the State of Florida informed Minda Schechter, who also called
18
on behalf of the Quanta Defendants, that the State of Florida will not seek a default judgment in
19
view of the agreed-upon extension; and
20
21
22
WHEREAS, permitting the Quanta Defendants’ responses to be filed on or before June
25, 2014, will have no effect on the schedule for this case.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the
23
Court, that the Quanta Defendants’ response to the State of Florida’s Second Amended Complaint
24
may be filed on or before June 25, 2014.
25
26
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Quanta Defendants and the State of Florida have caused
this Stipulation to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.
27
28
Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS
MDL No. 2143
ACTIVE/ 75951828.1
DRAFT
-2-
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Dated: June 17, 2014
2
For the Quanta Defendants:
/s/ Minda R. Schechter
Minda R. Schechter (SBN 065889)
NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP
333 South Grand Ave., 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Tel. (213) 787-2500
Fax (213) 687-0498
minda.schechter@novakdruce.com
3
4
5
6
Attorneys for Defendants
Quanta Storage, Inc. and
Quanta Storage America, Inc.
7
8
For the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney
General, Department of Legal Affairs:
9
/s/ Lizabeth A. Brady
Lizabeth A. Brady
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
ANTITRUST DIVISION
The Capitol, PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Tel. (850) 414-3851
Fax (850) 488-9134
liz.brady@myfloridalegal.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
Nicholas J. Weilhammer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
The Capitol, PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Tel. (850) 414-3300
Fax (850) 488-9134
nicholas.weilhammer@myfloridalegal.com
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff
State of Florida
20
21
22
23
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X.B., I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.
24
/s/ Minda R. Schechter
Minda R. Schechter (SBN 065889)
NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP
333 South Grand Ave., 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Tel. (213) 787-2500
Fax (213) 687-0498
minda.schechter@novakdruce.com
25
26
27
28
Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS
MDL No. 2143
ACTIVE/ 75951828.1
DRAFT
-3-
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Keith A. Walter, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Tel. (302) 467-4200
Fax (302) 467-4201
keith.walter@dbr.com
2
3
4
5
Attorneys for Defendants
Quanta Storage, Inc. and
Quanta Storage America, Inc.
6
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: __________________
6/18/14
10
_____________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS
MDL No. 2143
ACTIVE/ 75951828.1
DRAFT
-4-
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?