State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR QUANTA STORAGE, INC. AND QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/18/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Keith A. Walter, Jr. (admitted Pro Hac Vice) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Tel. (302) 467-4200 Fax (302) 467-4201 keith.walter@dbr.com Minda R. Schechter (SBN 065889) NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP 333 South Grand Ave., 23rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel. (213) 787-2500 Fax (213) 687-0498 minda.schechter@novakdruce.com Attorneys for Defendants QUANTA STORAGE INC. and QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION 17 ____________________________________ Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS Case No. 3:13-cv-1877-RS 18 This Document Relates To: 19 STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, v. HITACHI-LG DATA STORAGE, INC., et al. ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR QUANTA STORAGE, INC. AND QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 25 26 27 28 Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS MDL No. 2143 ACTIVE/ 75951828.1 DRAFT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 WHEREAS, on April 21, 2014, this Court entered an Order directing that the State of 2 Florida shall have until May 19, 2014, to file a second amended complaint and that defendants 3 shall file responses to the State of Florida’s second amended complaint on or before June 18, 4 2014 (Dkt. No. 1216); 5 6 7 WHEREAS, on May 19, 2014, the State of Florida filed its Second Amended Complaint (“Florida’s Second Amended Complaint”); WHEREAS, defendants Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc. (“the 8 Quanta Defendants”) response to Florida’s Second Amended Complaint is currently due on June, 9 18, 2014; 10 WHEREAS the Quanta Defendants seek a one week extension of time in which to 11 respond to the State of Florida’s second amended complaint because counsel of record Keith A. 12 Walter, Zhun Lu, and Curt Lambert have recently changed law firms from Novak Druce 13 Connolly Bove + Quigg LLP to Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, which has encumbered the 14 preparation and review of the Quanta Defendants’ responsive pleading; 15 16 WHEREAS, counsel for the State of Florida have agreed that the Quanta Defendants may have until June 25, 2014 to respond to the second amended complaint; 17 WHEREAS, counsel for the State of Florida informed Minda Schechter, who also called 18 on behalf of the Quanta Defendants, that the State of Florida will not seek a default judgment in 19 view of the agreed-upon extension; and 20 21 22 WHEREAS, permitting the Quanta Defendants’ responses to be filed on or before June 25, 2014, will have no effect on the schedule for this case. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the 23 Court, that the Quanta Defendants’ response to the State of Florida’s Second Amended Complaint 24 may be filed on or before June 25, 2014. 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Quanta Defendants and the State of Florida have caused this Stipulation to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. 27 28 Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS MDL No. 2143 ACTIVE/ 75951828.1 DRAFT -2- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Dated: June 17, 2014 2 For the Quanta Defendants: /s/ Minda R. Schechter Minda R. Schechter (SBN 065889) NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP 333 South Grand Ave., 23rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel. (213) 787-2500 Fax (213) 687-0498 minda.schechter@novakdruce.com 3 4 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc. 7 8 For the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs: 9 /s/ Lizabeth A. Brady Lizabeth A. Brady OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTITRUST DIVISION The Capitol, PL-01 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050 Tel. (850) 414-3851 Fax (850) 488-9134 liz.brady@myfloridalegal.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 Nicholas J. Weilhammer OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA The Capitol, PL-01 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050 Tel. (850) 414-3300 Fax (850) 488-9134 nicholas.weilhammer@myfloridalegal.com 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Florida 20 21 22 23 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X.B., I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 24 /s/ Minda R. Schechter Minda R. Schechter (SBN 065889) NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP 333 South Grand Ave., 23rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel. (213) 787-2500 Fax (213) 687-0498 minda.schechter@novakdruce.com 25 26 27 28 Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS MDL No. 2143 ACTIVE/ 75951828.1 DRAFT -3- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Keith A. Walter, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Tel. (302) 467-4200 Fax (302) 467-4201 keith.walter@dbr.com 2 3 4 5 Attorneys for Defendants Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc. 6 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: __________________ 6/18/14 10 _____________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143 RS MDL No. 2143 ACTIVE/ 75951828.1 DRAFT -4- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?