Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. v. OSD Audio et al

Filing 52

CORRECTED ADDENDUM TO SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

HIGHGRADE TECH. CO., LTD.,

Case No. 13-cv-01881-JST

Plaintiff,
9

CORRECTED ADDENDUM TO
SCHEDULING ORDER

v.
10
11

OSD AUDIO, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16

As an addendum to the Court’s Scheduling Order dated January 8, 2014, the Court hereby
ORDERS as follows:
As noted in the Scheduling Order, the parties must “bring any disputes regarding the format,

17

scope, or content of any tutorial or hearing to the Court’s attention at least five court days before the

18

tutorial or hearing.” The Court will deem as waived any objection raised less than five court days

19

before the tutorial or hearing. The parties shall lodge hard copies of their presentation materials

20
with the Court on the day of the tutorial or claim construction hearing.
21
22
23

The Court will reserve no more than two hours on its calendar for the tutorial, including a
brief recess. The tutorial will not be reported by a court reporter.

24

At claim construction, the Court will construe only the terms the parties identify in their

25

Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement as “most significant to the resolution of the

26

case up to a maximum of 10.” Patent Local Rule 4-3(c). The Court will reserve no more than

27
28

three hours on its calendar for the claim construction hearing, including a brief recess. The Court

1

prefers that the parties proceed term-by-term, with each party providing its views on each term

2

before moving on to the next. The Court’s use of time limits means that the parties may not have

3

the opportunity to present oral argument on every term they have submitted for construction, and

4

the parties should prioritize their presentations accordingly.

5

Dated: February 5, 2014

6
7
8

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2