Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC v. Neszhao Consulting Company, LLC

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 STIPULATION To Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/27/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)

Case3:13-cv-01894-JSW Document23-1 Filed08/27/13 Page1 of 3

1 MCGUIREWOODS LLP
2
3
4
5

A. BROOKS GRESHAM SBN #155954
PATRICIA L. VICTORY SBN #240114
1800 Century Park East
8th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310.315.8210
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
7 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC,
14 a Texas limited liability company,
Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

CASE NO. 13-CV-01894-JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

17 Neszhao Consulting Company, LLC, a

California limited liability company; and
18 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendant.

19
20
21

Plaintiff Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC (“Plaintiff" or “Tesoro”) and

22 Defendant Neszhao Consulting Company, LLC ("Defendant” or “Neszhao”) have presented to the
23 Court a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice, in which they have represented that
24 they have reached a complete resolution of Tesoro’s claims for relief in this action, memorialized
25 in a confidential settlement agreement and release.
26

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is

27 hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each
28 party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees, except as otherwise may be allocated in the
49538941.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Case3:13-cv-01894-JSW Document23-1 Filed08/27/13 Page2 of 3

1 parties’ confidential settlement agreement. The terms of the parties’ confidential settlement
2 agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this order and this Court shall retain
3 jurisdiction with respect to the confidential settlement agreement and for entry of judgment
4 pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Entry of Judgment should that become necessary.
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
August 27, 2013
8 Dated:_______________

9

_____________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
49538692.1

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE