J. et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 17

Order Granting 16 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule and Continue Hearing. Responses due by 8/30/2013. Replies due by 9/23/2013. Motion Hearing set for 10/9/2013 at 1:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 08/06/2013. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)

5

Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. 064578)
CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK
A Professional Corporation
California Plaza
2121 North California Blvd., Suite 1020
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

1
2
3
4

7
8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15

E.J., a minor by and through her guardians ad
litem Lisa Houlihan Johnson and Donald Arthur
Johnson; LISA HOULIHAN JOHNSON,
personally and on behalf of her minor child
E.J.; and DONALD ARTHUR JOHNSON,
personally and on behalf of his minor child
E.J.;

Case No. C13-01923 NC
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND
STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

16
17

vs.

18
19

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED
STATES COAST GUARD; and DOES 1
through 100;

20

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25

TO THE HONORABLE NATHANEAL COUSINS, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA:
WHEREAS Defendants have filed a motion to Dismiss and Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’
Complaint, set for hearing on September 11, 2013.

26

WHEREAS the parties, by and through their counsel of record, have discussed the

27

scheduling of this motion, and in light of their respective schedules, hereby stipulate and agree

28

to the following:

CASPER, MEADOWS,
SCHWARTZ & COOK
2121 N. California Blvd.,
Suite 1020
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
TEL: [phone]
FAX [phone]

Johnson v. United States Coast Guard, et al. Case No. C13-01923 NC
STIPULATION & (PROPOSED) ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE – MOTION TO DISMISS

Page 1

1

Opposition due:

August 30, 2013

2

Reply due:

September 23, 2013

3

New Hearing date:

October 9, 2013

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted,

5
6

DATED: August 6, 2013

/s/ - “Andrew C. Schwartz”
ANDREW C. SCHWARTZ, ESQ.
CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: August 6, 2013

/s/ - “Victoria R. Carradero”
VICTORIA R. CARRADERO, ESQ.
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Attorneys for Defendants

7
8
9
10
11

14
15

Opposition due:

August 30, 2013

Reply due:

September 23, 2013

New Hearing date:

October 9, 2013

16

19

S
DATED:

August 6, 2013

UNIT
ED

18

RT
U
O

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

THE HONORABLERDERED
O NATHANEAL COUSINS
United StatesT IS SO
I District Court Magistrate Judge

20

24

ER

. Cousins

LI

thanael M
Judge Na

A

H

23

RT

22

NO

21

R NIA

13

Pursuant to stipulation and for good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FO

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

25
26
27
28
CASPER, MEADOWS,
SCHWARTZ & COOK
2121 N. California Blvd.,
Suite 1020
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
TEL: [phone]
FAX [phone]

Johnson v. United States Coast Guard, et al. Case No. C13-01923 NC
STIPULATION & (PROPOSED) ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE – MOTION TO DISMISS

Page 2