American Licorice Company v. Total Sweeteners, Inc. et al
Filing
77
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Rescheduling Hearings on Motions to Dismiss filed by Domino Foods Inc, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 76 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORD ER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Rescheduling Hearings on Motions to Dismiss, 56 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint, 51 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Defendant Domino Foods, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Plaintiff Batory Foods' Third-Party Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Motion Hearing set for 2/13/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/10/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Bingham McCutchen LLP
RICK ROTHMAN (SBN 142437)
rick.rothman@bingham.com
COLIN C. WEST (SBN 184095)
colin.west@bingham.com
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111-4067
Telephone: 415.393.2000
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
Attorneys for Third-party Defendant
DOMINO FOODS, INC.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15
TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC.; individually
and doing business as BATORY FOODS,
INC., and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive,
Defendant.
16
17
TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC., individually
and doing business as BATORY FOODS,
CASE No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS
ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Date:
December 19, 2013
Time: 1:30
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Courtroom: 5
Complaint Filed: September 17, 2013
18
Third-party Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
21
22
23
24
SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINERY, a
subsidiary of IMPERIAL SUGAR
COMPANY; IMPERIAL SUGAR
COMPANY; IMPERIAL DISTRIBUTING,
INC.; DOMINO FOODS, INC.; and ROES 1
through 10, inclusive,
Third-party Defendants.
25
26
27
28
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN
LLP
Case No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
A/75857162
1
Third-party Plaintiff Total Sweeteners, Inc. (“Total Sweeteners”) and Third-party
2
Defendants Domino Foods, Inc. (“Domino”) and Imperial Distributing, Inc., Imperial Sugar
3
Company, and Savannah Sugar Refinery (collectively, “Imperial”), through their counsel of
4
record, hereby stipulate to reschedule both hearings on the Motions to Dismiss filed by Domino
5
and Imperial, respectively. Those hearings were previously scheduled for December 19, 2013,
6
but due to a scheduling conflict, the parties have agreed to reschedule both hearings to
7
February 13, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. The Court has indicated it has availability at that time.
8
DATED: December 10, 2013
9
Respectfully submitted,
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
10
11
By:
12
13
/s/ Colin C. West
Colin C. West
Attorneys for Third-party Defendant
Domino Foods, Inc.
14
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the
15
16
filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories below.
17
DATED: December 10, 2013
GORDON & REES LLP
18
By:
19
20
21
/s/ Mordecai D. Boone
Mordecai D. Boone
Kara Persson
Attorneys for Defendant Total Sweeteners,
Inc. dba Batory Foods
22
23
DATED: December 10, 2013
McGRATH NORTH MULLIN &
KRATS, PC LLO
24
25
By:
26
27
/s/ Patrick E. Brookhouser
Patrick E. Brookhouser, Jr.
Attorneys for Defendant Imperial
Distributing, Inc., et al.
28
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN
LLP
-2Case No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
A/75857162
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
S
4
5
VED
APPRO
Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
6
RT
ER
H
8
FO
NO
7
LI
Dated:____________________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
9
RT
U
O
3
12/10/13
R NIA
2
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN
LLP
-3Case No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
A/75857162
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?