American Licorice Company v. Total Sweeteners, Inc. et al

Filing 77

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Rescheduling Hearings on Motions to Dismiss filed by Domino Foods Inc, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 76 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORD ER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Rescheduling Hearings on Motions to Dismiss, 56 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint, 51 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Defendant Domino Foods, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Plaintiff Batory Foods' Third-Party Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Motion Hearing set for 2/13/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/10/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Bingham McCutchen LLP RICK ROTHMAN (SBN 142437) rick.rothman@bingham.com COLIN C. WEST (SBN 184095) colin.west@bingham.com Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 Attorneys for Third-party Defendant DOMINO FOODS, INC. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC.; individually and doing business as BATORY FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendant. 16 17 TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC., individually and doing business as BATORY FOODS, CASE No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Date: December 19, 2013 Time: 1:30 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Courtroom: 5 Complaint Filed: September 17, 2013 18 Third-party Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 21 22 23 24 SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINERY, a subsidiary of IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY; IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY; IMPERIAL DISTRIBUTING, INC.; DOMINO FOODS, INC.; and ROES 1 through 10, inclusive, Third-party Defendants. 25 26 27 28 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Case No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS A/75857162 1 Third-party Plaintiff Total Sweeteners, Inc. (“Total Sweeteners”) and Third-party 2 Defendants Domino Foods, Inc. (“Domino”) and Imperial Distributing, Inc., Imperial Sugar 3 Company, and Savannah Sugar Refinery (collectively, “Imperial”), through their counsel of 4 record, hereby stipulate to reschedule both hearings on the Motions to Dismiss filed by Domino 5 and Imperial, respectively. Those hearings were previously scheduled for December 19, 2013, 6 but due to a scheduling conflict, the parties have agreed to reschedule both hearings to 7 February 13, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. The Court has indicated it has availability at that time. 8 DATED: December 10, 2013 9 Respectfully submitted, BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 10 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Colin C. West Colin C. West Attorneys for Third-party Defendant Domino Foods, Inc. 14 In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the 15 16 filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories below. 17 DATED: December 10, 2013 GORDON & REES LLP 18 By: 19 20 21 /s/ Mordecai D. Boone Mordecai D. Boone Kara Persson Attorneys for Defendant Total Sweeteners, Inc. dba Batory Foods 22 23 DATED: December 10, 2013 McGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATS, PC LLO 24 25 By: 26 27 /s/ Patrick E. Brookhouser Patrick E. Brookhouser, Jr. Attorneys for Defendant Imperial Distributing, Inc., et al. 28 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP -2Case No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS A/75857162 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED S 4 5 VED APPRO Hon. Edward M. Chen United States District Judge . Chen dward M Judge E 6 RT ER H 8 FO NO 7 LI Dated:____________________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA 9 RT U O 3 12/10/13 R NIA 2 A 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP -3Case No. 2013-cv-01929 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS A/75857162

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?