Linder v. City of Emeryville et al

Filing 16

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte taking under advisement 15 Motion to Amend/Correct ; denying without prejudice 15 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JONATHAN LINDER,

9

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C -13-01934 EDL
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE
FILING

v.

11

THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE, ET AL.,

12

Defendant.

/

13
14

On July 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed Request to Amend Complaint and Request to Electronically

15

File. The request does not include the information the Court requires to decide whether to permit e-

16

filing. Therefore, the Court directs Plaintiff to the Court’s website for the appropriate motion and

17

proposed order that must be filed. The Court’s website is www.cand.uscourts.gov. To reach the

18

form motion and proposed order, Plaintiff should click on the “Pro se litigants” tab on the top of the

19

Court’s homepage, and then click on “Forms to use in a civil case” tab, which is near the bottom of

20

the pro se litigants page. The title of the form is “Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing

21

and Proposed Order.” Once Plaintiff files the motion and proposed order, the Court will make a

22

determination as to whether to allow Plaintiff to be an e-filer. Plaintiff’s request to be permitted to

23

use the Court’s electronic filing system (docket 15) is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff filing the

24

appropriate motion and proposed order from the Court’s website.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 17, 2013
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Chief Magistrate Judge