Cobb v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 181

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 153 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ron Nerio and BJ Fadem. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 16, 2013. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JASON COBB, Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 13-01955 JSW ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANTS NERIO AND FADEM WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. JPMORGAN CHASE, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 On August 30, 2013, Defendants Ron Nerio and BJ Fadem filed a motion to dismiss for 16 failure to state a claim, which is noticed for hearing on November 15, 2013. (Docket No. 153.) 17 On October 4, 2013, the Court issued an Order in which it noted that although the notice of the 18 motion refers to a memorandum of points and authorities, it did not appear that Defendants 19 actually e-filed that document. The Court also noted that it had not received a chambers copy 20 of the motion or the memorandum of points and authorities. 21 Because Plaintiff opposed the motion and responded to arguments that Defendants 22 appeared to have raised in their memorandum of points and authorities, the Court directed 23 Defendants to electronically file the memorandum of points and authorities by October 11, 24 2013. Because Plaintiff had opposed the motion, the Court stated that Plaintiff should not file a 25 new opposition, and because Defendants had not filed a reply within the time allowed by the 26 Northern District Civil Local Rules, the Court stated that a reply would not be permitted. Defendants failed to file their memorandum of points and authorities by October 11, 27 28 2013. Accordingly, on October 15, 2013, the Court granted Defendants one final opportunity to 1 electronically file the memorandum of points and authorities in support of their motion to 2 dismiss, and it Ordered Defendants Fadem and Nerio to electronically file their memorandum 3 by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 16, 2013. The Court also advised Defendants that if they 4 failed to file their memorandum of points and authorities by 12:00 p.m. on October 16, 2013, 5 the Court shall deny the motion without prejudice. 6 Defendants failed to comply with the Court’s deadline. Accordingly, the Court DENIES 7 their motion to dismiss (Docket No. 153) without prejudice to re-filing it in accordance with 8 Northern District Civil Local Rule 7. The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for 9 November 15, 2013. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 16, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?