Perrine v. Sega of America, Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER GRANTING 34 STIPULATION selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/24/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2013)

Case3:13-cv-01962-JSW Document34 Filed09/20/13 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAMION PERRINE, et al.
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
SEGA OF AMERICA, INC.,
,
et al.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
3:13-cv-01962-JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Mediation through
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

April 11, 2014
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
9/20/2013

Dated:____________
9/20/2013

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

____________________________
/s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
Attorney for Plaintiff s John Locke and Damion
Perrine
____________________________
/s/ Rodger R. Cole
Attorney for Defendant s
Sega of America, Inc. and Gearbox
Software, L.L.C.

Case3:13-cv-01962-JSW Document34 Filed09/20/13 Page2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
9

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 24, 2013

__________________________________
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2