Klahn v. Quizmark, LLC
Filing
20
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 17, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DANIEL P. KLAHN SR.,
No. C 13-1977 MMC
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED
v.
QUIZMARK, LLC,
Defendants.
13
/
14
15
On April 30, 2013, plaintiff filed his complaint in the above-titled action. On June 18,
16
2013, plaintiff was ordered to pay the $350 filing fee no later than July 2, 2013. (See Order
17
Denying Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed June 18, 2013); 28
18
U.S.C. § 1914 (establishing $350 fee for filing civil action).1 On July 2, 2013, plaintiff made
19
a partial payment of $200. To date, the balance of the fee remains unpaid.
20
Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later
21
than July 26, 2013, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to
22
comply with the Court’s order.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: July 17, 2013
25
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
26
27
1
28
Effective May 1, 2013, the filing fee increased to $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914,
Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees. As plaintiff filed his complaint on April 30, 2013,
however, the increase is not applicable to the instant action.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?