Activevideo Networks, Inc v. Trans Video Electronics, Ltd
Filing
23
ORDER re Sur-Reply for 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/30/2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC.,
9
Plaintiff,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD.,
12
No. C-13-1980 EMC
ORDER RE SUR-REPLY
Defendant.
___________________________________/
(Docket No. 8)
13
14
15
Defendant Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. (“TVE”) has filed a motion to dismiss based lack of
16
subject matter jurisdiction and lack of personal jurisdiction. In its reply brief, TVE has now offered
17
what appears to be a covenant not to sue. See Djurovich Decl. ¶ 20. Because Plaintiff ActiveVideo
18
Networks, Inc. (“AV”) has not been given an opportunity to comment on the covenant not to sue, the
19
Court hereby orders AV to file a sur-reply, limited to the issue of the covenant not to sue – in
20
particular, what impact that covenant has on subject matter jurisdiction. The sur-reply shall be filed
21
within one week of the date of this order.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: July 30, 2013
25
26
27
28
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?