Activevideo Networks, Inc v. Trans Video Electronics, Ltd

Filing 23

ORDER re Sur-Reply for 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/30/2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC., 9 Plaintiff, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD., 12 No. C-13-1980 EMC ORDER RE SUR-REPLY Defendant. ___________________________________/ (Docket No. 8) 13 14 15 Defendant Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. (“TVE”) has filed a motion to dismiss based lack of 16 subject matter jurisdiction and lack of personal jurisdiction. In its reply brief, TVE has now offered 17 what appears to be a covenant not to sue. See Djurovich Decl. ¶ 20. Because Plaintiff ActiveVideo 18 Networks, Inc. (“AV”) has not been given an opportunity to comment on the covenant not to sue, the 19 Court hereby orders AV to file a sur-reply, limited to the issue of the covenant not to sue – in 20 particular, what impact that covenant has on subject matter jurisdiction. The sur-reply shall be filed 21 within one week of the date of this order. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: July 30, 2013 25 26 27 28 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?