Amini v. Colvin
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Plaintiff has until 2/14/2014 to file motion and response to this order. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/17/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11 BEHZAD AMINI,
Case No. 13-cv-01984 NC
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner of
15
16
Social Security,
Defendant.
17
18
On July 30, 2013, defendant filed an answer and a notice that the administrative
19 record has been filed manually. Dkt. Nos. 9-10. Defendant also filed a proof of service
20 indicating that the administrative transcript was served by first class mail on pro se plaintiff
21 Behzad Amini on August 6, 2013. Dkt. No. 11. The Local Rules and the Procedural Order
22 for Social Security Review issued in this case provide that plaintiff must serve and file a
23 motion for summary judgment or remand within 28 days of receipt of defendant’s answer.
24 Dkt. No. 2; Civ. L.R. 16-5. Plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary judgment or for
25 remand. “Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.”
26 Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, plaintiff has until February
27 14, 2014, to file a motion in compliance with Civil Local Rule 16-5 and to show cause in
28 writing why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff’s failure to respond will result in
Case No. 13-cv-01984 NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
al
ase
judice.
1 dismissa of this ca with prej
2
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
3
Date: January 17, 2014
y
4
____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
11
1
12
2
13
3
14
4
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
Case No. 13-cv-0198 NC
84
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
R
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?