Ohio Public Employees Retirement System et al v. McKesson Corporation

Filing 25

ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for8/2/13 at 2:30 p.m. is continued 8/9/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/21/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 5 ALI ABTAHI (State Bar No. 224688) aabtahi@abtahilaw.com IDENE SAAM (State Bar No. 258741) isaam@abtahilaw.com ABTAHI LAW FIRM 1012 Torney Avenue San Francisco, CA 94129 Tel: (415) 639-9800 Fax: (415) 639-9801 6 [Additional counsel on signature page] 7 Special Counsel for Plaintiffs 8 11 PAUL C. FLUM (State Bar No. 104424) paulflum@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 268-7335 Fax: (415) 268-7522 12 Counsel for Defendant 2 3 4 9 10 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, and HIGHWAY PATROL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiffs, vs. MCKESSON CORPORATION, Defendant. ) Case No.: 13-CV-02000-SI ) ) JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and between 2 Plaintiffs Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, State Teachers Retirement System 3 of Ohio, Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation, and Highway Patrol Retirement System 4 (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “OPERS”) and Defendant McKesson Corporation 5 (“McKesson”), through their respective attorneys, as follows: 6 The initial case management conference in this matter is currently scheduled for 7 August 2, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The parties’ deadline to meet and confer pursuant to Federal 8 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), to file ADR certifications, and to file either a Stipulation to 9 ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Teleconference, is currently set for July 12, 10 2013. The parties’ 26(f) report, initial disclosures, and joint case management statement 11 are currently due on July 25, 2013. 12 This action was initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Elena E. James, who had set 13 a case management conference for August 1, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. When this case was 14 reassigned to this Court, the case management conference was rescheduled to August 2, 15 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The deadline to reschedule the initial case management conference is 16 July 23, 2013. 17 The parties respectfully request that the case management conference be continued 18 to August 9, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The parties further request that the deadline to meet and 19 confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), to file ADR certifications, and 20 to file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Teleconference be 21 continued until 21 days prior to the case management conference, and that deadline for 22 the parties’ 26(f) report, initial disclosures, and joint case management statement be 23 continued until seven days prior to the conference. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI 1 1 Good cause exists for this request, because many of Plaintiffs’ counsel will 2 already be in San Francisco on August 9, 2013 for an ABA Convention. As lead 3 Plaintiffs’ counsel is located outside of California, granting this joint stipulation will 4 conserve costs by avoiding the need for duplicitous travel costs to San Francisco. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 19, 2013 MICHAEL DEWINE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL By: /s/ Ali Abtahi Ali Abtahi (State Bar No. 224688) Idene Saam (State Bar No. 258741) ABTAHI LAW FIRM 1012 Torney Avenue San Francisco, CA 94129 Tel: (415) 639-9800 Fax: (415) 639-9801 aabtahi@abtahilaw.com isaam@abtahilaw.com James L. Ward, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) Robert S. Wood (Pro Hac Vice) RICHARDSON PATRICK WESTBROOK & BRICKMAN, LLC P.O. Box 1007 Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465 Tel: (843) 727-6500 Fax: (843) 216-6509 jward@rpwb.com bwood@rpwb.com R. Bryant McCulley (Pro Hac Vice) McCULLEY McCLUER PLLC 1919 Oxmoor Road, No. 213 Birmingham, AL 35209 Tel: (205) 238-6757 Fax: (904) 239-5388 bmculley@mcculleymccluer.com Stuart H. McCluer (Pro Hac Vice) McCULLEY McCLUER PLLC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI 2 1 1223 Jackson Avenue East, Suite 200 Oxford, MS 38655 Tel: (662) 236-1401 Fax: (662) 368-1506 smccluer@mcculleymccluer.com 2 3 4 Jack T. Diamond (Pro Hac Vice) Donald W. Davis, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND, LLC 75 East Market Street Akron, Ohio 44308 Tel: (330) 253-5060 Fax: (330) 253-1977 jtdiamond@bmdllc.com dwdavis@bmdllc.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 Special Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 12 Dated: June 19, 2013 MORRISON & FOERSTER 13 14 By: /s/ Paul Flum 15 19 Paul C. Flum (State Bar No. 104424) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 268-7335 Fax: (415) 268-7522 paulflum@mofo.com 20 Counsel for Defendant 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6/21/13 Dated: ___________________ ________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI 3 1 2 GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document 3 has been obtained from each of the signatories and I shall maintain records to support this 4 concurrence for subsequent production for the court is so ordered or for inspection upon 5 request by a party. 6 7 Dated: June 19, 2013 ABTAHI LAW FIRM 8 9 10 By: /s/ Ali Abtahi Ali Abtahi Special Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?