Ohio Public Employees Retirement System et al v. McKesson Corporation
Filing
25
ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for8/2/13 at 2:30 p.m. is continued 8/9/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/21/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)
1
5
ALI ABTAHI (State Bar No. 224688)
aabtahi@abtahilaw.com
IDENE SAAM (State Bar No. 258741)
isaam@abtahilaw.com
ABTAHI LAW FIRM
1012 Torney Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: (415) 639-9800
Fax: (415) 639-9801
6
[Additional counsel on signature page]
7
Special Counsel for Plaintiffs
8
11
PAUL C. FLUM (State Bar No. 104424)
paulflum@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: (415) 268-7335
Fax: (415) 268-7522
12
Counsel for Defendant
2
3
4
9
10
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE
TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM
OF OHIO, OHIO BUREAU OF
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, and
HIGHWAY PATROL RETIREMENT
SYSTEM,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MCKESSON CORPORATION,
Defendant.
) Case No.: 13-CV-02000-SI
)
) JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI
1
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and between
2
Plaintiffs Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, State Teachers Retirement System
3
of Ohio, Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation, and Highway Patrol Retirement System
4
(collectively “Plaintiffs” or “OPERS”) and Defendant McKesson Corporation
5
(“McKesson”), through their respective attorneys, as follows:
6
The initial case management conference in this matter is currently scheduled for
7
August 2, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The parties’ deadline to meet and confer pursuant to Federal
8
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), to file ADR certifications, and to file either a Stipulation to
9
ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Teleconference, is currently set for July 12,
10
2013. The parties’ 26(f) report, initial disclosures, and joint case management statement
11
are currently due on July 25, 2013.
12
This action was initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Elena E. James, who had set
13
a case management conference for August 1, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. When this case was
14
reassigned to this Court, the case management conference was rescheduled to August 2,
15
2013 at 2:30 p.m. The deadline to reschedule the initial case management conference is
16
July 23, 2013.
17
The parties respectfully request that the case management conference be continued
18
to August 9, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. The parties further request that the deadline to meet and
19
confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), to file ADR certifications, and
20
to file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Teleconference be
21
continued until 21 days prior to the case management conference, and that deadline for
22
the parties’ 26(f) report, initial disclosures, and joint case management statement be
23
continued until seven days prior to the conference.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI
1
1
Good cause exists for this request, because many of Plaintiffs’ counsel will
2
already be in San Francisco on August 9, 2013 for an ABA Convention. As lead
3
Plaintiffs’ counsel is located outside of California, granting this joint stipulation will
4
conserve costs by avoiding the need for duplicitous travel costs to San Francisco.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 19, 2013
MICHAEL DEWINE
OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: /s/ Ali Abtahi
Ali Abtahi (State Bar No. 224688)
Idene Saam (State Bar No. 258741)
ABTAHI LAW FIRM
1012 Torney Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: (415) 639-9800
Fax: (415) 639-9801
aabtahi@abtahilaw.com
isaam@abtahilaw.com
James L. Ward, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)
Robert S. Wood (Pro Hac Vice)
RICHARDSON PATRICK WESTBROOK &
BRICKMAN, LLC
P.O. Box 1007
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465
Tel: (843) 727-6500
Fax: (843) 216-6509
jward@rpwb.com
bwood@rpwb.com
R. Bryant McCulley (Pro Hac Vice)
McCULLEY McCLUER PLLC
1919 Oxmoor Road, No. 213
Birmingham, AL 35209
Tel: (205) 238-6757
Fax: (904) 239-5388
bmculley@mcculleymccluer.com
Stuart H. McCluer (Pro Hac Vice)
McCULLEY McCLUER PLLC
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI
2
1
1223 Jackson Avenue East, Suite 200
Oxford, MS 38655
Tel: (662) 236-1401
Fax: (662) 368-1506
smccluer@mcculleymccluer.com
2
3
4
Jack T. Diamond (Pro Hac Vice)
Donald W. Davis, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)
BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND, LLC
75 East Market Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
Tel: (330) 253-5060
Fax: (330) 253-1977
jtdiamond@bmdllc.com
dwdavis@bmdllc.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Special Counsel for Plaintiffs
11
12
Dated: June 19, 2013
MORRISON & FOERSTER
13
14
By: /s/ Paul Flum
15
19
Paul C. Flum (State Bar No. 104424)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: (415) 268-7335
Fax: (415) 268-7522
paulflum@mofo.com
20
Counsel for Defendant
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6/21/13
Dated: ___________________
________________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI
3
1
2
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document
3
has been obtained from each of the signatories and I shall maintain records to support this
4
concurrence for subsequent production for the court is so ordered or for inspection upon
5
request by a party.
6
7
Dated: June 19, 2013
ABTAHI LAW FIRM
8
9
10
By: /s/ Ali Abtahi
Ali Abtahi
Special Counsel for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO.: 13-CV-02000-SI
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?