Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. GSI Technology, Inc.

Filing 63

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 56 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answers and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation's Complaints for Patent Infringement in Consolidated Cases; filed by GSI Technology, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 31, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING v. GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Re: ECF No. 56 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 13-cv-02013-JST 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant GSI Technology, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File First 14 Amended Answers and Affirmative Defenses. ECF No. 56. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have 16 thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral 17 argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for February 6, 2014, is hereby 18 VACATED. 19 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 20 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 21 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 22 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 23 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should reflect the date or dates 24 on which the parties are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 31, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?