United States of America v. Real Property and Improvements Located at 2366 San Pablo Avenue, Berkeley, California
Filing
112
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 110 Joint Stipulation Request Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 for Order Enlarding Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; [Proposed] Order Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 filed by City of Berkeley. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 15, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2014)
7
DANIEL ABRAHAMSON (BAR NO. 158668)
DAbrahamson@drugpolicy.org
TAMAR TODD (BAR NO. 211865)
TTodd@drugpolicy.org
THESHIA NAIDOO (BAR NO. 209108)
TNaidoo@drugpolicy.org
LINDSAY LASALLE (BAR NO. 267072)
LLaSalle@drugpolicy.org
DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE
918 Parker Street, Building A21
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: 510.229.5211
Facsimile: 510.295.2810
8
Attorneys for Claimant CITY OF BERKELEY
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
15
Case No: CV 13-2027 JST
JOINT STIPULATION REQUEST
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 712
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
vs.
REAL PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED AT 2366 SAN PABLO AVENUE,
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA,
Trial Date: None Set
Defendant.
________________________________________
NAHLA DROUBI,
Owner of Record.
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, all parties to this matter, by and through their respective
26
attorneys of record, hereby do stipulate and request that the deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion
27
for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”) be extended to 14 days after the date on which the Court rules on
28
1
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12
1
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Claim on City of Berkeley for lack of standing filed on March 21,
2
2014 and continuation of the hearing on the MSJ until such time as the briefing is complete.
3
4
5
There will be no prejudice to Plaintiff because Plaintiff’s reply will run from the new date
pursuant to Local Rule 7-3.
DATED:
May 13, 2014
DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE
6
7
___/s/ Tamar Todd_____________________
TAMAR TODD
Attorneys for Claimant
CITY OF BERKELEY
8
9
10
11
DATED:
May 13, 2014
FLYNN RILEY BAILEY & PASEK LLP
12
___/s/ David Tillotson__________________
David Tillotson
Attorneys for Owner of Record
Nahla Droubi
13
14
15
16
DATED:
May 13, 2014
HENRY G. WYKOWSKI & ASSOCIATES
17
____/s/ Henry G. Wykowski_____________
HENRY G. WYKOWSKI
Attorneys for Claimant
BERKELEY PATIENTS GROUP, INC.
18
19
20
21
DATED:
May 13, 2014
SARA M. TAYLOR
Attorney at Law
22
23
___/s/ Sara M. Taylor____________________
Sara M. Taylor
Attorney for Claimants,
MARY DAVIS, ETIENNE FONTAN,
CINDY SMITH, JEFFREY BISHOP,
ROBIN BISHOP, GWENDOLYN
MCCALOPE
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12
1
DATED:
May 13, 2014
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
2
3
__/s/ Arvon J. Perteet___________________
ARVON J. PERTEET
Assistant United States Attorney
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
S
nS
J u d ge J o
ER
H
12
RT
11
NO
10
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO
13
R NIA
9
UNIT
ED
8
DATED: May 15, 2014
TA
RT
U
O
6
7
S DISTRIC
TC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
TE
. Ti ga r
FO
5
is filed to secure a new hearing date on the Motion for Summary Judgment.
DATED:______________________
_______________________________________
PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TIGAR
JON S.
LI
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk via e-mail once the opposition brief
A
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?