United States of America v. Real Property and Improvements Located at 2366 San Pablo Avenue, Berkeley, California

Filing 112

ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 110 Joint Stipulation Request Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 for Order Enlarding Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; [Proposed] Order Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 filed by City of Berkeley. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 15, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2014)

7

DANIEL ABRAHAMSON (BAR NO. 158668)
[e-mail]
TAMAR TODD (BAR NO. 211865)
[e-mail]
THESHIA NAIDOO (BAR NO. 209108)
[e-mail]
LINDSAY LASALLE (BAR NO. 267072)
[e-mail]
DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE
918 Parker Street, Building A21
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510.295.2810

8

Attorneys for Claimant CITY OF BERKELEY

1
2
3
4
5
6

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

15

Case No: CV 13-2027 JST
JOINT STIPULATION REQUEST
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 712

Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

vs.
REAL PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED AT 2366 SAN PABLO AVENUE,
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA,

Trial Date: None Set

Defendant.
________________________________________
NAHLA DROUBI,
Owner of Record.
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, all parties to this matter, by and through their respective

26

attorneys of record, hereby do stipulate and request that the deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion

27

for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”) be extended to 14 days after the date on which the Court rules on

28
1
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12

1

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Claim on City of Berkeley for lack of standing filed on March 21,

2

2014 and continuation of the hearing on the MSJ until such time as the briefing is complete.

3
4
5

There will be no prejudice to Plaintiff because Plaintiff’s reply will run from the new date
pursuant to Local Rule 7-3.
DATED:

May 13, 2014

DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE

6
7

___/s/ Tamar Todd_____________________
TAMAR TODD
Attorneys for Claimant
CITY OF BERKELEY

8
9
10
11

DATED:

May 13, 2014

FLYNN RILEY BAILEY & PASEK LLP

12

___/s/ David Tillotson__________________
David Tillotson
Attorneys for Owner of Record
Nahla Droubi

13
14
15
16

DATED:

May 13, 2014

HENRY G. WYKOWSKI & ASSOCIATES

17
____/s/ Henry G. Wykowski_____________
HENRY G. WYKOWSKI
Attorneys for Claimant
BERKELEY PATIENTS GROUP, INC.

18
19
20
21

DATED:

May 13, 2014

SARA M. TAYLOR
Attorney at Law

22
23

___/s/ Sara M. Taylor____________________
Sara M. Taylor
Attorney for Claimants,
MARY DAVIS, ETIENNE FONTAN,
CINDY SMITH, JEFFREY BISHOP,
ROBIN BISHOP, GWENDOLYN
MCCALOPE

24
25
26
27
28
2

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12

1

DATED:

May 13, 2014

MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

2
3

__/s/ Arvon J. Perteet___________________
ARVON J. PERTEET
Assistant United States Attorney

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

S

nS
J u d ge J o

ER

H

12

RT

11

NO

10

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO

13

R NIA

9

UNIT
ED

8

DATED: May 15, 2014

TA

RT
U
O

6
7

S DISTRIC

TC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
TE

. Ti ga r

FO

5

is filed to secure a new hearing date on the Motion for Summary Judgment.
DATED:______________________
_______________________________________
PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TIGAR
JON S.

LI

4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties shall contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk via e-mail once the opposition brief

A

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 7-12