United States of America v. Real Property and Improvements Located at 2366 San Pablo Avenue, Berkeley, California

Filing 172

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 163 MOTION to Stay Action Pending Appeal filed by Berkeley Patients Group, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 1, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2014)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 13-cv-02027-JST Plaintiff, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 8 REAL PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 2366 SAN PABLO AVENUE, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, 9 Re: ECF No. 163 Defendant. 7 10 Before the Court is the City of Berkeley’s Motion to Stay this Action Pending Appeal. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ECF No. 163. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the 12 Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, 13 currently scheduled for December 11, 2014, is hereby VACATED. 14 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 15 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 16 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 17 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 18 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 19 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 20 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?