East Bay Municipal Utility District et al v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Conference and Hearings as to 38 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and 37 MOTION to Dismiss Case Management Conference rescheduled to 12/11/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/28/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
P. RANDOLPH FINCH JR., SBN 185004
1
2
E-MAIL:
EMAIL:
djones@mftb.com
MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP
3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4747 EXECUTIVE DRIVE – SUITE 700
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121-3107
4
TELEPHONE: (858) 737-3100
FACSIMILE: (858) 737-3101
5
6
pfinch@mftb.com
DUSTIN R. JONES, SBN 251335
Attorneys for Defendant Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT; SACRAMENTO COUNTY
WATER AGENCY; FREEPORT WATER
AUTHORITY; CITY OF SACRAMENTO;
CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and CITY OF RIO
VISTA,
15
ex rel. BILL HALEY; HARRY
ROTZ; and LEW LONG,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Assigned to:
Hon. William H. Orrick, Courtroom 2
Complaint Filed: October 26, 2012
Trial Date:
Not Set
v.
18
CASE NO: 13-CV-02032 WHO
BALFOUR BEATTY
INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. and DOES 1
through 100,
19
20
Defendants.
21
/ / / / /
22
/ / / / /
23
/ / / / /
24
/ / / / /
25
/ / / / /
26
/ / / / /
27
/ / / / /
28
/ / / / /
STIPULATION AND ORDER
13-CV-02032 WHO
1
This stipulation is entered into between Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. (“Balfour
2
Beatty”) and qui tam plaintiffs Bill Haley, Harry Rotz and Lew Long (collectively the
3
“Relators”). Balfour Beatty and the Relators stipulate through counsel as follows:
4
5
6
1.
A case management conference is currently scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on
November 12, 2013.
2.
The below motions by Balfour Beatty are currently scheduled to be heard at
7
2:00 p.m. on December 4, 2013:
8
(a)
Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1) Of The Federal Rules Of
9
Civil Procedure Or, Alternatively, For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of
10
The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure; and
11
(b)
12
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure.
13
3.
Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The
The Relators’ oppositions to the above-referenced motions are currently due on
14
November 1, 2013. Balfour Beatty’s replies in support of the above-referenced motions are
15
currently due on November 8, 2013.
16
17
4.
Balfour Beatty and the Relators request the above briefing deadlines, motion
hearings and case management conference be rescheduled as follows:
18
Item
Proposed Rescheduled Time/Date
19
The Relators’ Oppositions
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
20
Balfour Beatty’s Replies
Friday, November 22, 2013
21
Motion Hearings
2:00 p.m. on Wednesday,
December 11, 2013
Case Management Conference
2:00 p.m. on Wednesday,
December 11, 2013
22
23
24
5.
The reason for the requested enlargement of time is to allow both parties to
25
adequately brief the issues raised by both motions and in light of other commitments, including
26
scheduled depositions in this case.
27
/ / / / /
28
MARKS, FINCH,
THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP
4747 Executive
Drive - Suite 700
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 737-3100
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
13-CV-02032 WHO
1
6.
2
motions.
3
7.
4
5
There have been no previous time modifications with respect to the present
The parties anticipate that the enlargement of time will have no appreciable
effect on the schedule for the case.
8.
Balfour Beatty and the Relators understand the Court normally holds case
6
management conferences on Tuesdays. However, Balfour Beatty and the Relators request the
7
Court hold the case management conference at the same time as the motion hearings (i.e., 2:00
8
p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013) in order to preserve judicial resources. If this date is
9
not available for the Court, the parties request the Court set the case management conference
10
for a date after December 11, 2013.
11
SO STIPULATED.
12
DATED: October 25, 2013
13
Respectfully submitted,
MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP
14
15
By:
/s/ P. Randolph Finch Jr.___________
P. RANDOLPH FINCH JR.
DUSTIN R. JONES
Defendant Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
E-mail: pfinch@mftb.com
djones@mftb.com
16
17
18
19
DATED: October 25, 2013
DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP
20
21
By:
/s/ Eric B. Myers
JOHN J. DAVIS, JR.
ERIC B. MYERS
Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiffs and Relators Bill Haley,
Harry Rotz and Lew Long
E-mail: jjdavis@dcbsf.com
ebm@dcbsf.com
22
23
24
25
/ / / / /
26
/ / / / /
27
/ / / / /
28
MARKS, FINCH,
THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP
4747 Executive
Drive - Suite 700
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 737-3100
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER
13-CV-02032 WHO
1
ORDER
2
3
After considering the above stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court orders as
follows:
4
1.
The hearing on Balfour Beatty’s Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1)
5
Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Or, Alternatively, For Judgment On The Pleadings
6
Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is rescheduled to 2:00 p.m.
7
on December 11, 2013.
8
2.
The hearing on Balfour Beatty’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings
9
Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is rescheduled to 2:00 p.m.
10
on December 11, 2013.
3.
11
12
later than November 12, 2013.
13
14
The Relators’ oppositions to the above-referenced motions must be filed no
4.
Balfour Beatty’s replies in support of the above-referenced motions must be
filed no later than November 22, 2013.
15
5.
The case management conference is rescheduled to 2 p.m. on December 11,
16
2013.
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
DATED:October 28, 2013
20
__________________________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1439.011/35S4252.nlh
28
MARKS, FINCH,
THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP
4747 Executive
Drive - Suite 700
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 737-3100
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER
13-CV-02032 WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?