East Bay Municipal Utility District et al v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Conference and Hearings as to 38 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and 37 MOTION to Dismiss Case Management Conference rescheduled to 12/11/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/28/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)

Download PDF
P. RANDOLPH FINCH JR., SBN 185004 1 2 E-MAIL: EMAIL: djones@mftb.com MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP 3 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4747 EXECUTIVE DRIVE – SUITE 700 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121-3107 4 TELEPHONE: (858) 737-3100 FACSIMILE: (858) 737-3101 5 6 pfinch@mftb.com DUSTIN R. JONES, SBN 251335 Attorneys for Defendant Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT; SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY; FREEPORT WATER AUTHORITY; CITY OF SACRAMENTO; CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and CITY OF RIO VISTA, 15 ex rel. BILL HALEY; HARRY ROTZ; and LEW LONG, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Assigned to: Hon. William H. Orrick, Courtroom 2 Complaint Filed: October 26, 2012 Trial Date: Not Set v. 18 CASE NO: 13-CV-02032 WHO BALFOUR BEATTY INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. and DOES 1 through 100, 19 20 Defendants. 21 / / / / / 22 / / / / / 23 / / / / / 24 / / / / / 25 / / / / / 26 / / / / / 27 / / / / / 28 / / / / / STIPULATION AND ORDER 13-CV-02032 WHO 1 This stipulation is entered into between Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. (“Balfour 2 Beatty”) and qui tam plaintiffs Bill Haley, Harry Rotz and Lew Long (collectively the 3 “Relators”). Balfour Beatty and the Relators stipulate through counsel as follows: 4 5 6 1. A case management conference is currently scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on November 12, 2013. 2. The below motions by Balfour Beatty are currently scheduled to be heard at 7 2:00 p.m. on December 4, 2013: 8 (a) Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1) Of The Federal Rules Of 9 Civil Procedure Or, Alternatively, For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of 10 The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure; and 11 (b) 12 Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure. 13 3. Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The The Relators’ oppositions to the above-referenced motions are currently due on 14 November 1, 2013. Balfour Beatty’s replies in support of the above-referenced motions are 15 currently due on November 8, 2013. 16 17 4. Balfour Beatty and the Relators request the above briefing deadlines, motion hearings and case management conference be rescheduled as follows: 18 Item Proposed Rescheduled Time/Date 19 The Relators’ Oppositions Tuesday, November 12, 2013 20 Balfour Beatty’s Replies Friday, November 22, 2013 21 Motion Hearings 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 Case Management Conference 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 22 23 24 5. The reason for the requested enlargement of time is to allow both parties to 25 adequately brief the issues raised by both motions and in light of other commitments, including 26 scheduled depositions in this case. 27 / / / / / 28 MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP 4747 Executive Drive - Suite 700 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 737-3100 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER 13-CV-02032 WHO 1 6. 2 motions. 3 7. 4 5 There have been no previous time modifications with respect to the present The parties anticipate that the enlargement of time will have no appreciable effect on the schedule for the case. 8. Balfour Beatty and the Relators understand the Court normally holds case 6 management conferences on Tuesdays. However, Balfour Beatty and the Relators request the 7 Court hold the case management conference at the same time as the motion hearings (i.e., 2:00 8 p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013) in order to preserve judicial resources. If this date is 9 not available for the Court, the parties request the Court set the case management conference 10 for a date after December 11, 2013. 11 SO STIPULATED. 12 DATED: October 25, 2013 13 Respectfully submitted, MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP 14 15 By: /s/ P. Randolph Finch Jr.___________ P. RANDOLPH FINCH JR. DUSTIN R. JONES Defendant Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. E-mail: pfinch@mftb.com djones@mftb.com 16 17 18 19 DATED: October 25, 2013 DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP 20 21 By: /s/ Eric B. Myers JOHN J. DAVIS, JR. ERIC B. MYERS Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiffs and Relators Bill Haley, Harry Rotz and Lew Long E-mail: jjdavis@dcbsf.com ebm@dcbsf.com 22 23 24 25 / / / / / 26 / / / / / 27 / / / / / 28 MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP 4747 Executive Drive - Suite 700 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 737-3100 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER 13-CV-02032 WHO 1 ORDER 2 3 After considering the above stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court orders as follows: 4 1. The hearing on Balfour Beatty’s Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1) 5 Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Or, Alternatively, For Judgment On The Pleadings 6 Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is rescheduled to 2:00 p.m. 7 on December 11, 2013. 8 2. The hearing on Balfour Beatty’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings 9 Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is rescheduled to 2:00 p.m. 10 on December 11, 2013. 3. 11 12 later than November 12, 2013. 13 14 The Relators’ oppositions to the above-referenced motions must be filed no 4. Balfour Beatty’s replies in support of the above-referenced motions must be filed no later than November 22, 2013. 15 5. The case management conference is rescheduled to 2 p.m. on December 11, 16 2013. 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 DATED:October 28, 2013 20 __________________________________ HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1439.011/35S4252.nlh 28 MARKS, FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP 4747 Executive Drive - Suite 700 San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 737-3100 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER 13-CV-02032 WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?