Feduniak et al v. Old Republic National Title Company

Filing 20

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Maureen Feduniak, Robert Feduniak filed by Maureen Feduniak, Robert Feduniak. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/8/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013)

Feduniak et al v. Old Republic National Title Company

Doc. 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feduniak
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Old Republic National Title
,
Co.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
13 Civ 02060 EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private mediation through
4
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
a provider to be determined.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
4
9

January 31, 2014
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
July 30, 2013

____________________________
s/ Roger B. Mead
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
July 30, 2013

____________________________
s/ Paul T. Martin
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
Dockets.Justia.com

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

dwa
Judge E

FO

RT

__________________________________

H

ER

A

8/8/13

hen

rd M. C

NO

Dated:

R NIA

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

LI

UNIT
ED

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

9x
9

C

N
F
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D I DISTRICT
TO
S T RIC

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2