Rodgers v. Munk et al
Filing
15
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James finding as moot 14 Motion for Reconsideration (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff,
10
11
No. C 13-2116 MEJ (pr)
RUSSELL DWAYNE RODGERS,
v.
Doc. No. 14
GREG MUNKS, San Mateo County Sheriff,
12 et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
Plaintiff Russell Dwayne Rodgers filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
17
§ 1983 complaining of conditions at the San Mateo County jail, where he is incarcerated. On
18
June 7, 2012, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Doc. no. 8. On June
19
18, 2013, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Doc. no. 10. On June 28, 2013, the Court
20
issued an Order of Partial Service, finding that Plaintiff’s due process claim was not
21
cognizable and that his Eighth Amendment claim for the denial of hygiene supplies was
22
cognizable. The Court ordered service of the Eighth Amendment claim on Defendants
23
Sheriff Munks, Lt. Kankel, Lt. Copeland and Sgt. Justice. Doc. no. 13.
24
On July 1, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, in which he seeks
25
reconsideration of both his claims, the due process claim and the Eighth Amendment claim
26
based on denial of hygiene supplies. Doc. no. 14. Plaintiff signed this motion on June 27,
27
2013 and the postmark on the envelop is dated June 28, 2013. Therefore, Plaintiff mailed
28
this motion before he received the Court’s Order of Partial Service, which was filed on June
28, the same day Plaintiff mailed his motion for reconsideration.
1
2
Because Plaintiff filed his motion for reconsideration before he had the benefit of
reading the Court’s Order of Partial Service, the motion is denied as moot.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
DATED:
July 17, 2013
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?