Rodgers v. Munk et al

Filing 15

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James finding as moot 14 Motion for Reconsideration (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff, 10 11 No. C 13-2116 MEJ (pr) RUSSELL DWAYNE RODGERS, v. Doc. No. 14 GREG MUNKS, San Mateo County Sheriff, 12 et al., 13 14 Defendants. / 15 16 Plaintiff Russell Dwayne Rodgers filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983 complaining of conditions at the San Mateo County jail, where he is incarcerated. On 18 June 7, 2012, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Doc. no. 8. On June 19 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Doc. no. 10. On June 28, 2013, the Court 20 issued an Order of Partial Service, finding that Plaintiff’s due process claim was not 21 cognizable and that his Eighth Amendment claim for the denial of hygiene supplies was 22 cognizable. The Court ordered service of the Eighth Amendment claim on Defendants 23 Sheriff Munks, Lt. Kankel, Lt. Copeland and Sgt. Justice. Doc. no. 13. 24 On July 1, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, in which he seeks 25 reconsideration of both his claims, the due process claim and the Eighth Amendment claim 26 based on denial of hygiene supplies. Doc. no. 14. Plaintiff signed this motion on June 27, 27 2013 and the postmark on the envelop is dated June 28, 2013. Therefore, Plaintiff mailed 28 this motion before he received the Court’s Order of Partial Service, which was filed on June 28, the same day Plaintiff mailed his motion for reconsideration. 1 2 Because Plaintiff filed his motion for reconsideration before he had the benefit of reading the Court’s Order of Partial Service, the motion is denied as moot. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: July 17, 2013 Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?