Reynolds v. Target

Filing 29

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; VACATING JULY 11, 2014 STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 19, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2014)

R NIA

sney

M. Che

LI

FO

S
UNIT
ED

RT
U
O

axine
Judge M

ER

*
D

DERE
SO OR

A

H

10 Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION
11 erroneously sued as Target

RT

6 GAIL C. TRABISH, ESQ. (SBN 103482)
BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
7 A Professional Corporation
555 12th Street, Suite 1800
8 Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]

IT IS

NO

1 K. DOUGLAS ATKINSON, ESQ.
ATKINSON & ASSOCIATES
2 710 Central Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94117
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-440-7819
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff NANCY REYNOLDS
5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

* In light of the parties' stipulation, the Status
Conference currently set for July 11, 2014 is hereby
VACATED.
Dated: June 19, 2014

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17 NANCY REYNOLDS,
18

Plaintiffs,

19 vs.
20 TARGET and Does 1-25, inclusive
21
22

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.:

C13-2141 MMC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Complaint Filed: May 2, 2012
[San Mateo County Superior Court
Case # Civ513535]

23
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff NANCY REYNOLDS, by and
25
through her attorney of record, K. Douglas Atkinson, Esq., and Defendant TARGET
26
CORPORATION, by and through its attorney of record, Gail C. Trabish, Esq., that plaintiff will
27
28
-1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL – US District Court Case No. C13-2141 MMC

1 dismiss, with prejudice, Defendant TARGET CORPORATION pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1),
2 with each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.
3
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
7 DATED: June 18, 2014
ATKINSON & ASSOCIATES

8
9
10

By: ____/s/___________________________
K. DOUGLAS ATKINSON, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NANCY REYNOLDS

11
12
13
14
15 DATED:

June 17, 2014
BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
A Professional Corporation

16
17

By: ____/s/___________________________
GAIL C. TRABISH, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION

18
19
20

27215\662102

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL – US District Court Case No. C13-2141 MMC