Hickman v. County of Butte et al
Filing
13
ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/10/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CLARENCE B. HICKMAN, SR.,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-13-2147 EMC (pr)
COUNTY OF BUTTE; et al.,
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
On September 9, 2013, mail was sent from the Court to Plaintiff at the address he provided
15
on his complaint and was returned undelivered on September 25, 2013, marked “return to sender -
16
not deliverable as addressed - unable to forward.” (Docket # 12.) Plaintiff has not provided any
17
address other than the address to which the undeliverable mail was sent. More than sixty days have
18
passed since the mail was returned to the Court undelivered. Plaintiff has failed to comply with
19
Local Rule 3-11(a) which requires that a party proceeding pro se must “promptly file with the Court
20
and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address”
21
when his address changes. Local Rule 3-11(b) allows the Court to dismiss a complaint without
22
prejudice when mail directed to a pro se party is returned as not deliverable and the pro se party fails
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
to send a current address within sixty days of the return of the undelivered mail. This action is
2
dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to keep the Court informed of his current
3
address in compliance with Local Rule 3-11(a). The Clerk shall close the file.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: December 10, 2013
8
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?