Shaw v. Westmoor Village, LLC et al

Filing 42

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/26/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Tanya E, Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CECIL SHAW, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) WESTMOOR VILLAGE, LLC, a California ) ) limited liability company, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) No. 3:13-cv-02164-RS SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, the Court issued its Scheduling Order for Cases 2 Asserting Denial of Right of Access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ECF No. 2) 3 (“the Scheduling Order”); 4 WHEREAS, the parties, with the exception of Defendants Hany Selim, aka Selim 5 Touring Experts, dba Liquor Tobacco & Gift; and Marcelle Dabbas, aka Marcelle Selim, aka 6 Selim Touring Experts, dba Liquor Tobacco & Gift (hereafter “the LTG Defendants”), 7 conducted a site inspection of the subject properties on August 20, 2013; 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has settled this matter as to the LTG Defendants and has filed a 9 request for dismissal of the LTG Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10 41(a)(2), which request is pending (ECF No. 39); 11 WHEREAS, the parties previously requested and have been granted an extension of 12 time to complete the in-person meet and confer required under General Order 56 such that the 13 last date for the conference is currently November 29, 2013 (ECF No. 37); 14 WHEREAS, due to the unavailability of parties, counsel and/or experts, the Parties 15 will not be able to hold the conference prior to the November 29, 2013 deadline and have 16 confirmed their availability to hold the conference on December 5, 2013; 17 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that the last date by which the in- 18 person meet and confer must be conducted in this action be continued from November 29, 19 2013 to December 5, 2013, and that Plaintiff shall file a notice of need for mediation, if 20 necessary, within 14 days of the meet and confer. 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 23 Dated: November 11, 2013 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 24 25 26 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 1 Dated: November 26, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID G. FINKELSTEIN 2 /s/ Irene Y. Fujii Irene Y. Fujii Attorneys for Defendants Westmoor Village, LLC, a California limited liability company, and Harshad I. Patel dba Michael’s Hallmark & Fine Gifts 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: November 26, 2013 8 LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY A. CHEN /s/ Jeffrey A. Chen Jeffrey A. Chen Attorneys for Defendant Shi Yong Lin dba China Wok 9 10 11 Dated: November 26, 2013 KRING & CHUNG, LLP 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Shane Singh Shane Singh Attorneys for Defendant Starbucks Coffee Company, erroneously sued as Starbucks Corporation, a Washington corporation, dba Starbucks Store #5618 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3 1 ORDER 2 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date by which the in-person meet and confer 4 between the parties must be conducted in this action be continued from November 29, 2013 to 5 December 5, 2013, and that Plaintiff shall file a notice of need for mediation, if necessary, 6 within 14 days of the meet and confer. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: 11/26/13 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?