Shaw v. Westmoor Village, LLC et al
Filing
42
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/26/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)
1
2
3
Tanya E, Moore, Esq. SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CECIL SHAW,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
WESTMOOR VILLAGE, LLC, a California )
)
limited liability company, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
No. 3:13-cv-02164-RS
SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING
DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER
UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2013, the Court issued its Scheduling Order for Cases
2
Asserting Denial of Right of Access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ECF No. 2)
3
(“the Scheduling Order”);
4
WHEREAS, the parties, with the exception of Defendants Hany Selim, aka Selim
5
Touring Experts, dba Liquor Tobacco & Gift; and Marcelle Dabbas, aka Marcelle Selim, aka
6
Selim Touring Experts, dba Liquor Tobacco & Gift (hereafter “the LTG Defendants”),
7
conducted a site inspection of the subject properties on August 20, 2013;
8
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has settled this matter as to the LTG Defendants and has filed a
9
request for dismissal of the LTG Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
10
41(a)(2), which request is pending (ECF No. 39);
11
WHEREAS, the parties previously requested and have been granted an extension of
12
time to complete the in-person meet and confer required under General Order 56 such that the
13
last date for the conference is currently November 29, 2013 (ECF No. 37);
14
WHEREAS, due to the unavailability of parties, counsel and/or experts, the Parties
15
will not be able to hold the conference prior to the November 29, 2013 deadline and have
16
confirmed their availability to hold the conference on December 5, 2013;
17
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that the last date by which the in-
18
person meet and confer must be conducted in this action be continued from November 29,
19
2013 to December 5, 2013, and that Plaintiff shall file a notice of need for mediation, if
20
necessary, within 14 days of the meet and confer.
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
23
Dated: November 11, 2013
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
24
25
26
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
1
Dated: November 26, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID G. FINKELSTEIN
2
/s/ Irene Y. Fujii
Irene Y. Fujii
Attorneys for Defendants
Westmoor Village, LLC, a California limited
liability company, and Harshad I. Patel dba
Michael’s Hallmark & Fine Gifts
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: November 26, 2013
8
LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY A. CHEN
/s/ Jeffrey A. Chen
Jeffrey A. Chen
Attorneys for Defendant
Shi Yong Lin dba China Wok
9
10
11
Dated: November 26, 2013
KRING & CHUNG, LLP
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Shane Singh
Shane Singh
Attorneys for Defendant
Starbucks Coffee Company, erroneously sued as
Starbucks Corporation, a Washington corporation,
dba Starbucks Store #5618
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
1
ORDER
2
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last date by which the in-person meet and confer
4
between the parties must be conducted in this action be continued from November 29, 2013 to
5
December 5, 2013, and that Plaintiff shall file a notice of need for mediation, if necessary,
6
within 14 days of the meet and confer.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated: 11/26/13
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?