TPK Touch Solutions, Inc v. Wintek Electro-Optics Corportation et al

Filing 75

SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/9/14. (Filed on 5/9/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TPK TOUCH SOLUTIONS, INC,

Case No. 13-cv-02218-VC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

9
10

WINTEK ELECTRO-OPTICS
CORPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On May 1, 2014, Plaintiff TPK Touch Solutions Inc. (“TPK”) and Defendants Wintek

14

Corporation and Wintek Electro-Optics Corporation (collectively “Wintek” or “Defendants”)

15

submitted an Amended Joint Case Management Statement. Having considered the statement and

16

any other matter deemed to be appropriate by the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

17
1.

DISCOVERY PLAN

18
(a)

Production of ESI: The parties have exchanged a list of the most likely custodians

19
and databases of relevant electronic materials on January 17, 2014. The parties are currently
20
working on an agreement as to the method of searching, and the words, terms, and phrases to be
21
searched. The parties will also discuss the timing and conditions of any additional searches which
22
may become necessary in the normal course of discovery. To minimize the expense, the parties
23
may consider limiting the scope of the electronic search (e.g., time frames, fields, document
24
types). The parties shall finalize the agreement by May 23, 2014.
25
(b)

Privilege and trial-preparation material: The Court has entered a Stipulated

26
Protective Order on January 22, 2014. Docket No. 68.
27
28

1

(c)

2

All limitations on discovery imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16

Limits on Discovery:

The parties will confer if it appears that in good faith an alteration to the Rules is appropriate.
2.

SCHEDULE

EVENT
Close of Fact Discovery
Date of Status Conference
Disclosure of Expert Testimony and Reports
Rebuttal Expert Reports
Close of Expert Discovery
Plaintiff’s Opening Brief on Claim
Construction and Summary Judgment
Defendants’ Responsive Brief on Claim
Construction and Opening Brief on Cross
Motion
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief on Claim Construction
and Opposition to Cross Motion
Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition
to Cross Motion
Hearing on Claim Construction and Summary
Judgment Motions
Pre-Trial Conference
Trial

PROPOSED DATES
September 30, 2014
October 17, 2014
December 2, 2014
January 15, 2015
February 13, 2015
March 6, 2015
March 27, 2015

April 10, 2015
April 24, 2015
To be determined; subject to Court’s schedule
To be determined; subject to Court’s schedule
To be determined; subject to Court’s schedule

17
18
19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2014
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
2