True Health Chiropractic Inc v. McKesson Corporation
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 76 Discovery Letter Brief without prejudice. The parties shall meet and confer following the procedures in the standing order. 48 If they are unable to resolve this dispute without judicial intervention, they shall file a joint discovery letter by June 23, 2014.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC,
No. C-13-02219 DMR
ORDER DENYING JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER [DOCKET NO. 76] WITHOUT
The parties have filed a joint discovery letter before Judge Tigar. [Docket No. 76.] The
motion should have been addressed to Judge Ryu, to whom Judge Tigar has referred all discovery
matters in this case. See Docket No. 47. This court’s standing order requires parties to meet and
confer to try to resolve their disagreements prior to filing a joint discovery letter. See Docket No.
48. Defendant avers that Plaintiff has not met and conferred. See Docket No. 76 at 5.
Accordingly, the joint discovery letter is denied without prejudice. The parties shall meet
and confer following the procedures in the standing order. If they are unable to resolve this dispute
without judicial intervention, they shall file a joint discovery letter by June 23, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2014
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?