True Health Chiropractic Inc v. McKesson Corporation

Filing 77

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 76 Discovery Letter Brief without prejudice. The parties shall meet and confer following the procedures in the standing order. 48 If they are unable to resolve this dispute without judicial intervention, they shall file a joint discovery letter by June 23, 2014.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, 12 13 No. C-13-02219 DMR Plaintiff(s), v. 14 MCKESSON CORPORATION, 15 ORDER DENYING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER [DOCKET NO. 76] WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 The parties have filed a joint discovery letter before Judge Tigar. [Docket No. 76.] The 18 motion should have been addressed to Judge Ryu, to whom Judge Tigar has referred all discovery 19 matters in this case. See Docket No. 47. This court’s standing order requires parties to meet and 20 confer to try to resolve their disagreements prior to filing a joint discovery letter. See Docket No. 21 48. Defendant avers that Plaintiff has not met and conferred. See Docket No. 76 at 5. 22 Accordingly, the joint discovery letter is denied without prejudice. The parties shall meet 23 and confer following the procedures in the standing order. If they are unable to resolve this dispute 24 without judicial intervention, they shall file a joint discovery letter by June 23, 2014. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 12, 2014 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?