True Health Chiropractic Inc v. McKesson Corporation

Filing 77

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 76 Discovery Letter Brief without prejudice. The parties shall meet and confer following the procedures in the standing order. 48 If they are unable to resolve this dispute without judicial intervention, they shall file a joint discovery letter by June 23, 2014.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC,

12
13

No. C-13-02219 DMR

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

MCKESSON CORPORATION,

15

ORDER DENYING JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER [DOCKET NO. 76] WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

The parties have filed a joint discovery letter before Judge Tigar. [Docket No. 76.] The

18

motion should have been addressed to Judge Ryu, to whom Judge Tigar has referred all discovery

19

matters in this case. See Docket No. 47. This court’s standing order requires parties to meet and

20

confer to try to resolve their disagreements prior to filing a joint discovery letter. See Docket No.

21

48. Defendant avers that Plaintiff has not met and conferred. See Docket No. 76 at 5.

22

Accordingly, the joint discovery letter is denied without prejudice. The parties shall meet

23

and confer following the procedures in the standing order. If they are unable to resolve this dispute

24

without judicial intervention, they shall file a joint discovery letter by June 23, 2014.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2014
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge